strange rlm_expiration behavior

2008-10-01 Thread Flamur Rogova
Hi, I am having strange behavior of rlm_expiration where it always returns userlock, no matter what I put as expiration value. my radius install is latest from git repository, with default configuration (unchanged in any way), rlm_expiration rejects this user, date 10 Jan 2009, although it

Re: strange rlm_expiration behavior

2008-10-01 Thread Nicolas Goutte
Previous answers to questions about user expiration told to write dates like Expiration := May 10 2008 21:00:00 So in your case, you should perhaps try: Expiration := Jan 01 2009 00:00:00 Have a nice day! Am 01.10.2008 um 11:31 schrieb Flamur Rogova: Hi, I am having strange

Problem with EAP-TLS

2008-10-01 Thread Guk Victor
[preacct]: module files returns noop for request 5 modcall: leaving group preacct (returns ok) for request 5 Processing the accounting section of radiusd.conf modcall: entering group accounting for request 5 radius_xlat: '/var/log/radius/radacct/10.0.1.2/detail-20081001' rlm_detail: /var/log/radius

proxy.conf in freeradius 2.1.1

2008-10-01 Thread Olaf Gellert
Hi, I am just updating from an old freeradius (1.1.x) to a new one (2.1.1). Currently we have old style entries in the proxy.conf, some entries like: realm DEFAULT { type = radius authhost = 111.222.111.222:1812 accthost = 111.222.111.222:1813 secret = whatever

Re: Problem with EAP-TLS

2008-10-01 Thread tnt
Radius is working fine. Your problem is with NAS: .. rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host 10.0.1.2:5007, id=61, length=271 .. Acct-Status-Type = Stop .. Acct-Session-Time = 120 .. Acct-Terminate-Cause = Lost-Carrier .. Connection breaks after two minutes. Debug

Re: problem with ip_pools

2008-10-01 Thread Alan DeKok
Marco C. Coelho wrote: Did you put main_pool and main_pool into a fail-over section, as documented in man unlang ? No, and I must be blind, because I have read the section and cannot find mention of it. Sorry, the redundant section should do what you want. Alan DeKok. - List

Re: proxy.conf in freeradius 2.1.1

2008-10-01 Thread Alan DeKok
Olaf Gellert wrote: Using the same configuration file (which should still be supported), we get: Tue Sep 30 17:19:28 2008 : Error: PROXY: Marking home server 111.222.111.222 port 1813 as zombie (it looks like it is dead). Note: IP *and* port. For both servers (auth at

Re: proxy.conf in freeradius 2.1.1

2008-10-01 Thread tnt
Could someone spread some light how a new configuration (using home_server and home_server_pool etc) should look like? What is unclear about instructions in proxy.conf? Ivan Kalik Kalik Infromatika ISP - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

radius dies after HUP

2008-10-01 Thread Lisa Besko
I have an issue were Freeradius 1.1.7 dies after doing a kill -HUP on FreeBSD 7.1. I saw that there was an issue with this in version 1.1.6 but I did not see that it had been resolved. Anyone have a fix or a work around? Thanks, LB - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

FreeRadius

2008-10-01 Thread Marcel Grandemange
I have a working FreeRadius installation used for PPPOE clients using a Mikrotik NAS (Essentialy Linux) I am using Freeradius to limit data a user can send/receive within a month and automatically reset it every month. I used an example from chilliuspot hotspot for this. However

Re: radius dies after HUP

2008-10-01 Thread Alan DeKok
Lisa Besko wrote: I have an issue were Freeradius 1.1.7 dies after doing a kill -HUP on FreeBSD 7.1. I saw that there was an issue with this in version 1.1.6 but I did not see that it had been resolved. Anyone have a fix or a work around? Upgrade to 2.1.1. Or, re-start radiusd rather

ntlm_auth works on commandline but not in radiusd.conf

2008-10-01 Thread radius
Please forgive me as I'm a newbie to Radius. I've been reading FAQs and archived mail list for three days and haven't seen a problem similar to mine. ntlm_auth works as expected on the command line, however it does not work in radius. In radius it ALWAYS returns a status ok and authenticates

Re: ntlm_auth works on commandline but not in radiusd.conf

2008-10-01 Thread Alan DeKok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Very specifically, I followed the (out of date) guide by Alan DeKok called Deploying Radius Hmm... OK. I've updated the instructions for 2.x. exec ntlm_auth { wait = no That's the issue. It should say wait = yes. Sorry. I've

Re: proxy.conf in freeradius 2.1.1

2008-10-01 Thread Olaf Gellert
Alan DeKok wrote: For both servers (auth at 111.222.111.222:1812 and acc at port 1813) it reports Marking _home_ server, so does it not differentiate between both? Or is this just an oversimplification? It doesn't matter. The server is identified by IP port, which is what's being

Re: radius dies after HUP

2008-10-01 Thread Lisa Besko
Alan DeKok wrote: Lisa Besko wrote: I have an issue were Freeradius 1.1.7 dies after doing a kill -HUP on FreeBSD 7.1. I saw that there was an issue with this in version 1.1.6 but I did not see that it had been resolved. Anyone have a fix or a work around? Upgrade to 2.1.1. Or,

FW: FreeRadius

2008-10-01 Thread Marcel Grandemange
: Auth: Invalid user (rlm_sqlcounter: Maximum monthly usage time reached): [njale/CHAP-Password] (from client OldPPPOES port 40541 cli 00:0C:29:0B:44:66) I kept increasing the data limit via dialupadmin till it allowed me to connect. Ideas? __ NOD32 3485 (20081001) Information

Re: ntlm_auth works on commandline but not in radiusd.conf

2008-10-01 Thread luis a
--- El mié, 1/10/08, Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: De: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: ntlm_auth works on commandline but not in radiusd.conf Para: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Fecha: miércoles, 1 octubre, 2008 2:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Checking NAS-Identifier in the radgroupcheck table

2008-10-01 Thread super_tomtom
Hi ! I am actually setting up a freeradius server that will manage authentication from different places (hotels actually). I am just a beginner toward that technology, and i have one problem : I need to create some accounts that can be enabled at different places: for example you have an account

Re: Problem with EAP-TLS

2008-10-01 Thread Lech Karol Pawłaszek
Guk Victor wrote: Hi all. I have problem with EAP-TLS. Computer with OS Windows Vista, Freeradius 1.1.3. Immediately access to the network exists after connection, but access is forbidden through several minutes. This is what it is obtained: Well. I had very similar issue. If your NAS is

Re: FW: FreeRadius

2008-10-01 Thread Marco C. Coelho
dialupadmin till it allowed me to connect... Ideas? __ NOD32 3485 (20081001) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: ntlm_auth works on commandline but not in radiusd.conf

2008-10-01 Thread Alan DeKok
luis a wrote: i believe that you saw the images that i sent to you to see :) As a general rule, I ignore most private email asking for free help. That's what the list is for. radtest luis ..4wr123,,todoloco 127.0.0.1 0 testing123 Sending Access-Request of id 137 to 127.0.0.1

Re: proxy.conf in freeradius 2.1.1

2008-10-01 Thread Alan DeKok
Olaf Gellert wrote: Well, I guess the term home_server and the fact, that in the example the IP address is 127.0.0.1 made me think of something local, not a remote server to which requests are proxied. It's the users home. It's where they are authenticated. The term is widely used in the

Re: FreeRadius

2008-10-01 Thread Alexandre Chapellon
Hi Marcel I don't know if i'm right, or if it's related to your problem, but if you check the source of rlm_sqlcounter (rlm_sqlcounter.c), you may see that this module seems really time based (Alan will correct me if i'm wrong). Indeed the module contains a function that make it possible for a

The client does not connect _*_*_*_

2008-10-01 Thread Martin Silvero
sorry what they say is ... The access point has an IP 10.0.31.x and is included within raddb/client.conf, forget the IP 10.0.42.250 because I connect to that network to another topic. The server is in the 10.30.1.x , we do not need to be on the same network because they are VLAN

Re: ntlm_auth works on commandline but not in radiusd.conf

2008-10-01 Thread luis a
http://hotjobs.mycasacorp.com/images there are the images step by step setting up freeradius against AD and its not working for me in the config in the command line everything work okay but in the config he does not check it there pals greetings --- El mié, 1/10/08, Alan DeKok [EMAIL

The client does not connect _*_*_*_

2008-10-01 Thread Martin Silvero
hello!! Well, as was the theme for the month so again clarify the principle also returned thread. The server is installed and tested it with the test and walk in perfect condition. I configured the radius in the client (access point) and a local user testing, the user is in a notebook in which

Re: FW: FreeRadius

2008-10-01 Thread tnt
query = SELECT SUM(AcctInputOctets - GREATEST((%b - UNIX_TIMESTAMP(AcctStartTime)), 0))+ SUM(AcctOutputOctets -GREATEST((%b - UNIX_TIMESTAMP(AcctStartTime)), 0)) FROM radacct WHERE UserName='%{%k}' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(AcctStartTime) + AcctSessionTime '%b' What is GREATEST((%b -

Re: ntlm_auth works on commandline but not in radiusd.conf

2008-10-01 Thread tnt
I was under impression I answered this already, but I don't see it on the list, so here we go again: 1. Your ntlm_auth users file entry is wrong. There is no username or DEFAULT in it. 2. Instructions clearly say to put the entry at the beginning of the users file. What did you do - you put that

Re: Checking NAS-Identifier in the radgroupcheck table

2008-10-01 Thread tnt
http://wiki.freeradius.org/index.php/FreeRADIUS_Wiki:FAQ#It_still_doesn.27t_work.21 Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 1/10/2008, super_tomtom [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše: Hi ! I am actually setting up a freeradius server that will manage authentication from different places (hotels actually).

Re: The client does not connect _*_*_*_

2008-10-01 Thread tnt
The access point has an IP 10.0.31.x and is included within raddb/client.conf, forget the IP 10.0.42.250 because I connect to that network to another topic. The server is in the 10.30.1.x , we do not need to be on the same network because they are VLAN ruteables. Pinging responds well. What could