Hello,
I've been searching more documentation but there is too much about
attr_filter...
Is it possible to permit any attribute for DEFAULT entry instead of specifying
all posible attributes in a post-proxy answer?
Thanks in advance!
El Jueves, 19 de Mayo de 2005 11:42, David Manchado
Hello,
I would like to perform some control over the attributes returned post-proxy
in a realm but let any attribute return for the other realms.
my ${confdir}/attrs is:
realm1
Service-Type == Framed-User,
Login-Service =* ANY,
Login-TCP-Port =* ANY,
Hello,
I'm trying to understand the mechanism for Simultaneous-Use check.
In the doc (Debian package freeradius/testing 1.0.2-1) it says:
...Only when someone tries to login who _already_ has an active
session according to the radutmp file, the server executes the perl
script
] - username - realm '
* ^(.*)@(.*)$
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to 'service service-access_username - access
realm - username - realm '
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
--
David Manchado
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hello!
El Viernes, 18 de Marzo de 2005 19:42, Alan DeKok escribió:
David Manchado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to force that the whole realm adsl.realm1 must be rewritten as
adsl.realm1.com so I won't have to add the same user as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's just
user test to realm adsl.realm1
rlm_realm: Adding Realm = adsl.realm1
rlm_realm: Authentication realm is LOCAL.
Regards,
David
El Jueves, 17 de Marzo de 2005 18:48, Alan DeKok escribió:
David Manchado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to limitations on freeradius-dialupadmin I have all users
Hello,
I'm migrating from radiator into freeradius + freeradius-dialupadmin.
Due to limitations on freeradius-dialupadmin I have all users in the form
[EMAIL PROTECTED] without stripping in order to support that I can user [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with their own reply
Hello Alan,
Thanks for your help, now all I've to do it's to practice my almost forgotten
C skills.
Kind regards.
David
El Miércoles, 2 de Marzo de 2005 22:22, Alan DeKok escribió:
David Manchado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems freeradius does not support L2TP accounting for
Tunnel
in the NAS
because freeradius stores the status of the pool locally. Is there a way to
move ip pool mgmt into MySQL so in case of failure of the active, the backup
radius can get the status of the pool?
Thanks in advance. Regards
--
David Manchado
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
racceso4 port 0 unknown
packet type 10)
Wed Mar 2 20:44:19 2005 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Unsupported Acct-Status-Type
= 10
Thanks in advance, regards
--
David Manchado
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
10 matches
Mail list logo