RE: Returning attributes based on group membership using NTLM_AUTH

2011-08-08 Thread Moe, John
: Re: Returning attributes based on group membership using NTLM_AUTH Moe, John j...@hatch.com.au wrote: Oh goodie, I'm getting somewhere. :-) ...except on the top posting front email-nazi/. ;P You know, I even thought of that before I sent it, but noticed that the reply to which I

RE: Returning attributes based on group membership using NTLM_AUTH

2011-08-08 Thread Moe, John
-Original Message- [ snip ] # search reference ref: ldap://DomainDnsZones.my.domain.name/DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=my,DC=domain, DC =name # search result search: 5 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 3 # numEntries: 1 # numReferences: 1 So something still isn't right. Damn,

RE: Returning attributes based on group membership using NTLM_AUTH

2011-08-07 Thread Moe, John
-Bell Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2011 4:15 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Returning attributes based on group membership using NTLM_AUTH Cect ! :) -Arran On 3 Aug 2011, at 06:19, Moe, John wrote: Sorry to reply to my own post, but I think I've found the answer

Returning attributes based on group membership using NTLM_AUTH

2011-08-02 Thread Moe, John
I'm trying to set up switch logons for IT staff. Some will get operator (limited, read-only) access, some get manager (full) access. I've got two Active Directory groups that control which access they get. I've got the ntlm_auth section working with two different instances, one for each, using

RE: Returning attributes based on group membership using NTLM_AUTH

2011-08-02 Thread Moe, John
-Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+jmoe=hatch.com...@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users- bounces+jmoe=hatch.com...@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Moe, John Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2011 9:33 AM To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Subject: Returning

RE: Trying to wrap my head around FreeRadius config

2011-07-20 Thread Moe, John
-Original Message- So ask *specific* questions about what you expect, what's happening, and what you think is going wrong. Ask small questions, instead of long ones. It really makes a difference. Well, ok, I'll start again, go as far as I can, and then ask questions about

RE: Trying to wrap my head around FreeRadius config

2011-07-20 Thread Moe, John
-Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+jmoe=hatch.com...@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users- bounces+jmoe=hatch.com...@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Gary Gatten Sent: Thursday, 21 July 2011 9:29 AM To: 'FreeRadius users mailing list' Subject: RE: Trying

RE: Trying to wrap my head around FreeRadius config

2011-07-20 Thread Moe, John
-Original Message- 1.) Use only ntlm_auth. If necessary you can use require-membership- of (I forget exact syntax) to ensure only members of Network Admins can get a cli on your network gear. It will also work for 802.1x From what I've read, require-membership-of is a switch to

RE: Trying to wrap my head around FreeRadius config

2011-07-19 Thread Moe, John
: Trying to wrap my head around FreeRadius config On 07/19/2011 05:20 AM, Moe, John wrote: 1) When a RADIUS request gets received by the server, it first looks up the device in the clients.conf file. If it doesn't exist there, it ignores the request (with a message being logged saying

RE: Trying to wrap my head around FreeRadius config

2011-07-19 Thread Moe, John
to wrap my head around FreeRadius config Moe, John wrote: Moe, John wrote: Apologies in advance if this isn't the right forum for this, or if it's already been answered somewhere, and my Google-fu just isn't up to the task. Please point me in the right direction if either is the case

Trying to wrap my head around FreeRadius config

2011-07-18 Thread Moe, John
Hello, all Apologies in advance if this isn't the right forum for this, or if it's already been answered somewhere, and my Google-fu just isn't up to the task. Please point me in the right direction if either is the case. I've managed to get a FreeRadius instance up that will authenticate a

RE: Clarification / Confirmation needed re: FreeRadius against ActiveDirectory

2011-03-01 Thread Moe, John
/ Confirmation needed re: FreeRadius against ActiveDirectory Moe, John wrote: Now, I've read a lot of configuration pages (for Ubuntu, Samba, Winbind, and FreeRadius, to name a few) in the last few days, and my head's spinning a bit, and I'd like to make sure I'm doing this right

RE: Clarification / Confirmation needed re: Free Radius againstActive Directory

2011-03-01 Thread Moe, John
] On Behalf Of Moe, John Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 3:26 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: RE: Clarification / Confirmation needed re: FreeRadius against ActiveDirectory -Original Message- From: freeradius-users- bounces+jmoe=hatch.com

Clarification / Confirmation needed re: FreeRadius against Active Directory

2011-02-28 Thread Moe, John
I'm setting up an Ubuntu server (10.04LTS amd64) with FreeRadius (v2.1.8 from apt-get) to use as an authenticator against Active Directory for our HP ProCurve switches. I've gotten the server on to our Active Directory domain, and have begun the setup of the FreeRadius server. I've even managed

FreeRADIUS + Cygwin + Active Directory authentication?

2011-02-09 Thread Moe, John
I'm trying to set up a FreeRADIUS server in our organization, and the corporate preference is to run on Windows. I've got FreeRADIUS to compile and have successfully completed the PAP test (from http://deployingradius.com/documents/configuration/pap.html) to make sure it works. Now I'm looking