Hi,
RADSEC
These days, the more proper answer is: RFC6614
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6614
:-)
Stefan
--
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
Tel:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Muhammad Nuzaihan Kamal Luddin
muham...@taqisystems.com wrote:
Hi,
I have read on the archives regarding the above issue and that the
RADIUS shared secret is an obfuscation method of securing the
communications between the NAS and RADIUS Server.
One method i
Interesting method by using TLS. This is what i had in mind but couldn't
find the answer.
The only method i see is through proxying the requests, based on a
whitepaper i read - if this is what RFC6614 may contain.
What are the roadmap for this? Are there any initial work being done or
As I remmember, Alan mentioned that RADSEC will be implemented in
freeRadius 3...
On 9.4.2013 10:54, Muhammad Nuzaihan bin Kamal Luddin wrote:
Interesting method by using TLS. This is what i had in mind but couldn't
find the answer.
The only method i see is through proxying the requests,
Hi,
As I remmember, Alan mentioned that RADSEC will be implemented in
freeRadius 3...
correct. you can try/test/run FR3 today from GIT but if you want
to keep with FR2.x in the meantime you can always have a local proxy eg
RadSecProxy
which works fine with FR2.x (and each end can do
Muhammad Nuzaihan wrote:
What are the roadmap for this? Are there any initial work being done or
proof-of-concept work on this? By looking at implementations of TLS (in
combination of openssl/gnutls) on other protocols might be similar to
this but i may be wrong (i have yet to read on the
6 matches
Mail list logo
