Hi Alan,
Can't it be applied to 1.1.7 release, as there are many changes in the
conf. files between 1.1.7 and 2.0 ??
Thanks
Amr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
just a quick check... the smux.c patches ARE applied to the
2.0.x smux.c (but not part of the last 1.1.7 release).
the
Amr el-Saeed wrote:
Can't it be applied to 1.1.7 release, as there are many changes in the
conf. files between 1.1.7 and 2.0 ??
Ask redhat, or whoever is packaging your version of 1.1.7.
All new development, including bug fixes, are on the 2.0 release.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Hi,
Can't it be applied to 1.1.7 release, as there are many changes in the
conf. files between 1.1.7 and 2.0 ??
it probably could be applied to 1.1.7 source archive if
you build it yourself. your distro package maintainer, otherwise,
could release a 1.1.7 package with these patches in.
It
Hi Alan,
I have patches attached from RedHat for freeradius 1.1.3 .
Can we have a patched release from freeradius 1.1.7 ??
Thanks
Amr
Alan DeKok wrote:
Edvin Seferovic wrote:
I am also curious about the answer on this question ! Are there any plans to
implement AgentX
hi,
just a quick check... the smux.c patches ARE applied to the
2.0.x smux.c (but not part of the last 1.1.7 release).
the radius_snmp.c patches - converting an int to a long
(handling 64 bit better I'd guess)... havent been incorporated
into the 2.0.x tree.
alan
-
List
2008 09:05
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: SNMP error
Hi,
any suggestions about what to do to make snmp work on 64-bit??
Amr el-Saeed wrote:
Dear Alan,
i build from the source file that i downloaded from freeradius.org
i suspected the 64-bit
i made several trials
Hi,
any suggestions about what to do to make snmp work on 64-bit??
Amr el-Saeed wrote:
Dear Alan,
i build from the source file that i downloaded from freeradius.org
i suspected the 64-bit
i made several trials , and here is the result
freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL3 ,
Amr el-Saeed wrote:
any suggestions about what to do to make snmp work on 64-bit??
Debug it and submit a patch.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Edvin Seferovic wrote:
I am also curious about the answer on this question ! Are there any plans to
implement AgentX protocol into freeradius project?
No plans.
At this point, the only plans for 2.0 are minor feature improvements
and bug fixes. I plan on spending time working on the
Dear Alan,
i build from the source file that i downloaded from freeradius.org
i suspected the 64-bit
i made several trials , and here is the result
freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL3 , 32-bitworking
freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL5 , 32-bitworking
i have OS RHEL5
Amr el-Saeed wrote:
Hi Alan,
yes, i'm sure
i added the option in the SPEC file and then build the RPM
and about the second issue , i didn't have a debugging kernel but i
got one and install it and boot with it and got the same output !!
and ideas ??
thanks for help
Hi,
i have OS RHEL5
it looks like it didnt build with the required debug parts - once
again, as you are using the SPEC for your distro they could have other
things that mess it up - I can only help if you build
from the source and leave package management stuff alone.
alan
-
List
Amr el-Saeed wrote:
i have OS RHEL5
yes, i'm sure
i added the option in the SPEC file and then build the RPM
and about the second issue , i didn't have a debugging kernel but i
got one and install it and boot with it and got the same output !!
made RPM file with ( rpmbuild -ta
Hi Alan,
yes, i'm sure
i added the option in the SPEC file and then build the RPM
and about the second issue , i didn't have a debugging kernel but i
got one and install it and boot with it and got the same output !!
and ideas ??
thanks for help
(gdb) set logging file gdb-radiusd.log
Hi,
i followed the bugs file.
i recompiled the freeradius with --enable-developer actually i made RPM
file with ( rpmbuild -ta freeradius-1.1.7.tar.gz )
are you SURE That this worked fine - as if you used the standard
SPEC then you wouldnt enable the developer stuff.
(no debugging
hi alan,
i searched the freeradius.org for the debug instructions, but i found
nothing.
what do you mean exactly by debug instructions
i already have this in the radius debug mode
SMUX read start
SMUX connection closed: 66
SMUX connect try 1
SMUX open oid: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3317.1.3.1
SMUX open
Hi,
hi alan,
i searched the freeradius.org for the debug instructions, but i found
nothing.
what do you mean exactly by debug instructions
i already have this in the radius debug mode
read doc/bugs in the distribution tar file. i can send you a copy if
your archive doesnt contain it.
Dear All,
I have freeradius-1.1.7-1.
it was installed on RHEL 3
SNMP net-snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.22
every thing was going OK
i just installed RHEL 564-bit
recompiled the freeradius on the new OS and reinstall
the radius is working Ok
i have SNMP version net-snmp-5.3.1-19.el5
but every time
On Thursday 10 January 2008 08:41:30 Amr el-Saeed wrote:
but every time i wanted to snmpwalk from the radius i got that error
RADIUS-AUTH-SERVER-MIB::radiusMIB = No Such Object available on this
agent at this OID
the command i execute is snmpwalk -v2c -c testsnmp -m
this is the log
[smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57180
Jan 10 20:38:26 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd
Jan 10 20:38:26 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12
from 127.0.0.1:57181
Jan 10 20:38:26
hi,
known SNMP issues with 64bit and that version of SNMP.
you will need to follow the debug instructions to help debug
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I have getting this error when i run manualy checkrad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mibs]# checkrad cisco 192.168.1.1 766 mlpm264 BC3F
SNMP Error:
Received SNMP response with error code
error status: noSuchName
index 1 (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.9.2.1.18.766)
SNMPv1_Session (remote host: 192.168.1.1
766 mlpm264 BC3F
SNMP Error:
Received SNMP response with error code
error status: noSuchName
index 1 (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.9.2.1.18.766)
SNMPv1_Session (remote host: 192.168.1.1 [192.168.1.1].161)
community: public
request ID: -422345818
PDU
23 matches
Mail list logo
