Greetings Everyone, My goal is to use only ONE A (Authorization Only) as
starting of FR implementation. i do have different system to authenticate
users. Plan is to replace that with FR but one step at a time.
i tried with the following virtual server to accept everyone. With that
done, Everyone
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 10:45:01 schrieb Russell Mike:
Hi List
After googling for few days still not so much clear. Therefore, i have
decided to implement three *A* in three different steps. For now, i
only
want to use Authorize function of FR. i do not want authentication
Accounting
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 10:45:01 schrieb Russell Mike:
Hi List
After googling for few days still not so much clear. Therefore, i have
decided to implement three *A* in three different steps. For now, i
only
want to use Authorize function of FR. i do not want authentication
Accounting
On 06/05/2013 05:29 AM, Prabhpal S. Mavi wrote:
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 10:45:01 schrieb Russell Mike:
Hi List
After googling for few days still not so much clear. Therefore, i have
decided to implement three *A* in three different steps. For now, i
only
want to use Authorize function of
John Dennis wrote:
You're both right, now shake hands and make up :-) The problem with the
term authorization in radius is used in a non-standard way that leads to
confusion. The normal use of the term authorization (authz) indicates
what a principal is permitted to do and a principal must be
Dear Alan DeKok John Dennis
Thanks for your input, words and clarification. Explanation was very good.
Moreover, good to have people like you on the list.
Regards
Prabhpal Singh
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.comwrote:
John Dennis wrote:
You're both right,
Hi John Alan, Kindly clarify
Does this means, it is posible to use only authorize function of FR and
process all authentication requests with following virtual server?
1.
server accept_all_requests {
authorize {
update control {
Russell Mike wrote:
Hi John Alan, Kindly clarify
This isn't a private list. Messages should NOT be addressed to
individual people.
Just reply to a message. It's simpler, and more polite.
Does this means, it is posible to use only authorize function of FR and
process all authentication
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.comwrote:
Russell Mike wrote:
Hi John Alan, Kindly clarify
This isn't a private list. Messages should NOT be addressed to
individual people.
Apologies Everyone. Well noted for future
Just reply to a message. It's
Hi List
After googling for few days still not so much clear. Therefore, i have
decided to implement three *A* in three different steps. For now, i only
want to use Authorize function of FR. i do not want authentication
Accounting BUT authorization.
Using MySQL as a backend, Trying to make
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 10:45:01 schrieb Russell Mike:
Hi List
After googling for few days still not so much clear. Therefore, i have
decided to implement three *A* in three different steps. For now, i only
want to use Authorize function of FR. i do not want authentication
Accounting
Dear FreeRadius Gurus Greetings,
I work with an ISP, i have been asked to research about service
provisioning using AAA. I am NOT very new to FreeRadius. Have implemented
and managing central CoovaChilli hotspot solution where we run more than 35
hotspots across the city using CoovaChilli +
There is something called Daloradius which works with Freeradius
Eric M
From: Russell Mike radius@gmail.com
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 3:20 PM
Subject: Service Provisioning Using
--
*From:* Russell Mike radius@gmail.com
*To:* FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 3:20 PM
*Subject:* Service Provisioning Using AAA (FreeRadius)
Dear FreeRadius Gurus Greetings,
I work with an ISP, i
Russell Mike wrote:
Currently, We do manually connection / disconnection. If a customer did
not pay until 31st, somebody manually disconnect the link. And manually
connect when customer comes to pay.
That's what Session-Timeout is for. Set it to 1 day (86400 seconds).
That way they have
Dear Mulindawa / Marinal Alan Dekok
Thanks you very much for your advice, very much valuable for ME. Saw some
light end of the tunnel. i really need help, One more question please. Such
as as MAC authentication, is it possible to authenticate a device using IP
address FR? then i can further
Russell Mike wrote:
Dear Mulindawa / Marinal Alan Dekok
Thanks you very much for your advice, very much valuable for ME. Saw
some light end of the tunnel. i really need help, One more question
please. Such as as MAC authentication, is it possible to authenticate a
device using IP address
17 matches
Mail list logo
