Kevin J wrote:
Well, Radius protocol is not just machine-to-machine issue. I think you
don't understand how request protocol can be simulated by hammering with
our tool. We have tested various protocols by this tool.
The people here do have some experience with RADIUS. Including
.
- Original Message
From: Anders Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:52:20 PM
Subject: Re: performance report?
I still do ...
I've had 10 multi core boxes hammering one server, still
Does anybody know the performance on Sun T-1000?
Just noticed that radius cannot reach more than 20% CPU time when we ran a
heavy traffic with nas simulations. We have tested some other programs and
could reach even more than 90% so just curious anybody experienced the similar
result.
It is not likely your actually putting too much strain on the server side.
You¹ll need quite a lot of machines hammering the RADIUS server before it¹ll
break into a sweat. The client side would have higher CPU utilization then
the server side, per request.
Comparing one program to another is not
.
- Original Message
From: Anders Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:25:19 PM
Subject: Re: performance report?
Re: performance report? It is not likely your actually putting too much strain
regardless of adding more
clients under multi-threaded enviroment.
- Original Message
From: Anders Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:52:20 PM
Subject: Re: performance report?
Re: performance
6 matches
Mail list logo
