On 7 Oct 2013, at 02:30, Bruce Nunn ironr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up. I will look for this this coming weekend when I get
2.2.2 in production.
Jonathan Gazeley jonathan.gaze...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
We've recently upgraded our radius servers from 2.1.12 (CentOS 6
Hi,
if (Service-Type == NAS-Prompt-User) {
if (NAS-IP-Address =~ /^172\.17\.107\./) {
if (User-Name =~ /^wisms\-testing/) {
update control {
Auth-Type := Accept
}
ouch do you realise how dangerous that is? there
should be no need to send an access accept packet back
Hi,
If everyone's in favor, I'll release 2.2.2 on Monday.
hold request
now its monday AM and the load has gone back to higher levels
the server is freaking out and freezing witht he last message in
the log being
Mon Oct 7 07:50:28 2013 : Error: [event.c:2318] Internal sanity check
On 10/07/2013 08:40 AM, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
if (Service-Type == NAS-Prompt-User) {
if (NAS-IP-Address =~ /^172\.17\.107\./) {
if (User-Name =~ /^wisms\-testing/) {
update control {
Auth-Type := Accept
}
ouch do you realise how dangerous that is? there
On 07/10/13 08:40, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
if (Service-Type == NAS-Prompt-User) {
if (NAS-IP-Address =~ /^172\.17\.107\./) {
if (User-Name =~ /^wisms\-testing/) {
update control {
Auth-Type := Accept
}
ouch do you realise how dangerous that is? there
should
On 7 Oct 2013, at 09:59, Jonathan Gazeley jonathan.gaze...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
On 07/10/13 08:40, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
if (Service-Type == NAS-Prompt-User) {
if (NAS-IP-Address =~ /^172\.17\.107\./) {
if (User-Name =~ /^wisms\-testing/) {
update control {
Hi,
We're finding these nuggets of code as we dig deeper into James's
legacy config. If the Access-Accept response is not required, then
presumably I can ditch that entire code block and let the
wisms-testing auth attempt go through the system as any other user.
yesbut you'd be better
On 7 Oct 2013, at 10:36, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
We're finding these nuggets of code as we dig deeper into James's
legacy config. If the Access-Accept response is not required, then
presumably I can ditch that entire code block and let the
wisms-testing auth attempt go through
Hi,
Well you want the probes to go through and hit your backed authentication
servers,
and your databases, and any external resource.
..and get a valid user with access accept? bad. you are better off just
semding a reject -
just like RADIUS status server probes. it would be nice if the
On 7 Oct 2013, at 11:31, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
Well you want the probes to go through and hit your backed authentication
servers,
and your databases, and any external resource.
..and get a valid user with access accept? bad. you are better off just
semding a reject -
a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
now its monday AM and the load has gone back to higher levels
the server is freaking out and freezing witht he last message in
the log being
Mon Oct 7 07:50:28 2013 : Error: [event.c:2318] Internal sanity check failed
At least that's clearer.
It would
Hi,
clarification/agreement from Stefan or others?
tried the newest GIT this morning and the proxy issues were gone.
I haven't seen your Internal sanity check failed just yet (and am not
looking forward to it :-/ ).
Stefan
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
After many years of development, the FreeRADIUS team is happy to
announce Version 3 of the world's most popular server. The release was
delayed from June in order to track down and solve a number of
last-minute issues. We'd like to thank all of the beta testers for
helping with that process.
Congratulations Alan, Arran for pushing this out of the nest,
all the while being so attentive on the mailing list, along with Phil
and the other Alan :-)
You guys are truly obsessed. I get exhausted just reading your commit logs.
:-)
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Hi Alan,
Well I discovered a way to display a list of all active users without having to
implement FreeRadius accounting, which BTW is not as straight forward as it
should be.
I was able to display all active users through my StrongSwan server, with the
simple following command:
# strongswan
On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:39, Clint Petty cpe...@luthresearch.com wrote:
Hi Alan,
Well I discovered a way to display a list of all active users without having
to implement FreeRadius accounting, which BTW is not as straight forward as
it should be.
I was able to display all active users
Clint Petty wrote:
Hi Alan,
Well I discovered a way to display a list of all active users without having
to implement FreeRadius accounting, which BTW is not as straight forward as
it should be.
I was able to display all active users through my StrongSwan server, with the
simple
Brian Julin wrote:
You guys are truly obsessed. I get exhausted just reading your commit logs.
:-)
It's what I do.
I spend a fair amount of time on other things, too. But pushing
FreeRADIUS ahead is a high priority.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On 7 Oct 2013, at 23:00, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Brian Julin wrote:
You guys are truly obsessed. I get exhausted just reading your commit logs.
:-)
It's what I do.
I'm just in it for the groupies. Everyone knows girls dig guys who have a
working knowledge of
On 7 Oct 2013, at 23:23, Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org wrote:
On 7 Oct 2013, at 23:00, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Brian Julin wrote:
You guys are truly obsessed. I get exhausted just reading your commit
logs. :-)
It's what I do.
I'm just in it for
I remember Alan mentioned that 2.2.2 may be released today. I checked git for
2.x.x and it says 2.2.1. I am wondering if it'll be released soon.
Thanks,
Yu Wang
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
21 matches
Mail list logo
