Reals Based Upon Port

. Thanks a lot! Brian Carpio Senior Systems Engineer Office: +1.303.962.7242 Mobile: +1.720.319.8617 Email: bcar...@broadhop.com - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: Reals Based Upon Port

to send all traffic to server-balance how do I define a new realm which will accept traffic on 1815,1816 and send it to alt-server-balance. I hope that makes sense. Thanks, Brian Carpio -Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+bcarpio=broadhop@lists.freeradius.org

RE: Reals Based Upon Port

To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Reals Based Upon Port Brian Carpio wrote: I'm pretty clear on how I would add a new home_server_pool called like alt-server-balance with the other two home_servers defined which listen on the 1815,1816 the part I am confused about is how

RE: Reals Based Upon Port

-- Backend_Servers_Set02 (1815,1816) Lets try agian -Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+bcarpio=broadhop@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+bcarpio=broadhop@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Brian Carpio Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:10 AM To: FreeRadius users

RE: Reals Based Upon Port

either... Sorry I am probably making this more difficult then it needs to be, but again I simply want to use freeradius as a load balancer / proxy server. Thanks, Brian Carpio -Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+bcarpio=broadhop@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius

RE: Reals Based Upon Port

users mailing list Subject: Re: Reals Based Upon Port Brian Carpio wrote: Thanks for your help Alan, but I think I am not giving you the right information.. (that or I don't understand the README) So we are using freeradius for proxying requests to different backend servers only (basically

Freeradiusd 2.1.8

I have a production environment which is running freeradiusd 2.1.8 and last night in the logs I see the following message Sat Jan 1 20:11:24 2011 : Error: Mon Jan 10 17:04:58 2011 : Info: Exiting normally. No one was on the box doing anything... I was looking into this issue with google and

Proxy Maintenance Process

into maintenance so that freeradiusd doesn't attempt to send traffic to them? I'm not sure if there is a simple command we can run? Or is the only option to comment out the home_server from the home_server_pool and then kill -1 to the radiusd process? Brian Carpio - List info/subscribe

RE: Proxy Maintenance Process

, 2011 11:45 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Proxy Maintenance Process Brian Carpio wrote: Currently we are using freeradiusd to proxy / load balance requests to our backend radius application. However as I’m sure many of you encounter there are times which require maintenance

RE: Proxy Maintenance Process

but since my backend server still replies to heartbeat messages its marked alive immediately). -Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+bcarpio=broadhop@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+bcarpio=broadhop@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Brian Carpio

FreeRadius Multihomed VIP Issue

FreeRadius Version: FreeRADIUS Version 1.1.3 Ok here is the situation I have freeradius sitting between two networks 10.10.10.0 and 192.168.0.0, I want to combine freeradius and heartbeat so I can have a failover if one of the freeradius servers where to crash or needed to be upgraded. I'm using

freeradius2 Load-Balance Issue

Hi, I am using FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.7, this is the RPM for RHEL made available from (http://people.redhat.com/jdennis/freeradius-rhel-centos) which was linked by the RedHat FAQ on the FreeRadius Wiki (actually I downloaded the .srpm and change the .spec file to include --with-udpfromto in the

Re: freeradius2 Load-Balance Issue

Yes thank you very much upgrading to 2.1.8 resolved the issue. Brian On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.comwrote: Brian Carpio wrote: I am using FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.7, this is the RPM for RHEL made available from (http://people.redhat.com/jdennis

radiusd -X On First Boot

and such then I can cntrl + c and start free radius from that point forward using the init script... my question is why do I have to do this? Is there anyway around this? Thanks, Brian Carpio - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: radiusd -X On First Boot

--create-keys (obviously that isn't it)... Or is there another way to create the keys? Brian Carpio On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: Hi, I am running RHEL 5.3 and FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.8. When I install freeradius and attempt to start it for the first