Hi,
compiled and runs on a test server (but no real traffic load).
One thing has changed from recently: on my openSUSE 11.2 i586
previously, I had to compile ---with-system-libtool, and *not using
that* would break the build.
Now, it's vice versa: --with-system-libtool breaks, and without
Stefan Winter wrote:
One thing has changed from recently: on my openSUSE 11.2 i586
previously, I had to compile ---with-system-libtool, and *not using
that* would break the build.
Now, it's vice versa: --with-system-libtool breaks, and without it,
stuff works.
Yes... I changed it so that
Hi,
The only bug here is that the server should complain if you have two
instances of the same module defined. That would prevent the server
from starting in this case, and highlight the fact that the
configuration is wrong.
that would be the obvious and ideal way to deal with
Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
Is it worth tweaking the eap.conf comment so that it is explicitly
mentioned that for session resumption to work sensibly for TTLS/PEAP
that
Alexander Clouter wrote:
Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
Is it worth tweaking the eap.conf comment so that it is explicitly
mentioned that for session resumption to work sensibly for TTLS/PEAP
Alan Buxey wrote:
Hi,
The only bug here is that the server should complain if you have two
instances of the same module defined. That would prevent the server
from starting in this case, and highlight the fact that the
configuration is wrong.
that would be the obvious and ideal way to
On 2010/09/22 03:15 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
I've put some preliminary tar files on:
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
Would be nice to remove +git from debian/changelog
--
Johan Meiring
Cape PC Services
John Horne wrote:
We also have the file /etc/raddb/modules-local/attr_filter which
contains:
Have you *deleted* the default configuration for the
attr_filter.post-proxy module?
If not, you have *two* copies of the module configuration. That's why
it's having issues. It picks on the first
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:05 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
John Horne wrote:
So, I guess the question is why is freeradius reloading the post-proxy
filter a second time after the HUP?
The question is why do you have two configurations for the same module?
The only bug here is that the
I just noticed the redhat/freeradius.spec file wasn't fully updated in
2.1.0. It was missing the dynamic_clients and opendirectory modules in
the %files section. Also the release tag was left at 2 instead of being
reset to 1. Attached is a patch, in addition to the above it adds the
changelog
John Dennis wrote:
I just noticed the redhat/freeradius.spec file wasn't fully updated in
2.1.0. It was missing the dynamic_clients and opendirectory modules in
the %files section. Also the release tag was left at 2 instead of being
reset to 1. Attached is a patch, in addition to the above it
I've put some preliminary tar files on:
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
The changelog is *extensive*. There are a large number of minor bugs
fixed, and a lot of minor new features added. But the result
Last call for 2.1.10
I haven't had a chance to rework the patch for saving replies after a PEAP/TTLS
reject (been very busy at work). I'll try to get to it today; but, I assume
it's too late for 2.1.10 at this point, right?
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org
Garber, Neal wrote:
Last call for 2.1.10
I haven't had a chance to rework the patch for saving replies after a
PEAP/TTLS reject (been very busy at work). I'll try to get to it today; but,
I assume it's too late for 2.1.10 at this point, right?
I'll take a look... but 2.1.10 has been
On 22/09/10 14:15, Alan DeKok wrote:
I've put some preliminary tar files on:
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
Can we squeeze one quick VSA update into dictionary.extreme:
ATTRIBUTE
On 22/09/10 15:14, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 22/09/10 14:15, Alan DeKok wrote:
I've put some preliminary tar files on:
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
Can we squeeze one quick VSA update into
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:15 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
I've put some preliminary tar files on:
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
If there are any issues, let me know now.
We have an issue but I am a little lost as to where things are going
wrong.
If I set the uid/gid and 'mode=rw' in
John Horne wrote:
The problem seems to be that although the proxy server returns a 'Yes'
reply (meaning the user is authenticated)
What does that mean? There is no standard attribute to transport a Yes.
Although this looks like a pppd problem, it only occurs after we have
issued 'radmin
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:53 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
John Horne wrote:
The problem seems to be that although the proxy server returns a 'Yes'
reply (meaning the user is authenticated)
What does that mean? There is no standard attribute to transport a Yes.
Sorry, the 'Yes' is just the
Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com writes:
I've put some preliminary tar files on:
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
A little late into the game, but I just noticed this:
bj...@nemi:~$ radclient -v
On 09/22/2010 09:15 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
I've put some preliminary tar files on:
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
If there are any issues, let me know now. Otherwise we'll release
2.1.10 on Monday.
I verified 2.1.10 builds and produces an RPM. My apologies but I don't
have time at the
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:02 +0100, John Horne wrote:
The failed login has no MS-CHAP2-Success attribute being sent back.
Okay. The problem is to do with attribute filtering, but that in turn
seems to be caused by freeradius doing something unexpected when it
receives the HUP.
We define the
Hi,
I've just tried to compile with my usual set of configure flags, and got:
/usr/bin/libtool --mode=link gcc -o radeapclient radeapclient.lo
libeap/libfreeradius-eap.la -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lcrypto -lssl
-lcrypto
libtool: link: gcc -o .libs/radeapclient .libs/radeapclient.o
On 2010/08/12 09:36 AM, Stefan Winter wrote:
/root/freeradius-server-2.1.10-pre/src/lib/.libs/libfreeradius-radius.so
-lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/usr/local/freeradius/2.1.10-pre/lib
libeap/.libs/libfreeradius-eap.so: undefined reference to `radius_pairmake'
collect2:
Stefan Winter wrote:
libeap/.libs/libfreeradius-eap.so: undefined reference to `radius_pairmake'
This was noted the other day. I committed a fix, and just pushed it
back to the git repositories.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 2010/08/12 10:02 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Stefan Winter wrote:
libeap/.libs/libfreeradius-eap.so: undefined reference to `radius_pairmake'
This was noted the other day. I committed a fix, and just pushed it
back to the git repositories.
I can confirm that it compiles on Debian Lenny
Hi,
This was noted the other day. I committed a fix, and just pushed it
back to the git repositories.
Thanks. Re-pulled, compiled, installed, works with test requests.
Stefan
--
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
27 matches
Mail list logo
