Hi Darren,
the ico and average7 are about the same computationally. However, it is
more convenient to use average7 it has a surface that you can directly
render the results on. With ico, you'd still have to run mri_surf2surf
to convert it to another surface.
I'm not sure what you're trying to
Hi Doug et al,
from looking at the help on mris_surfglm it appears that vertices in the
analyses are not as dense as those from the subject surfaces. I'm guessing
that using the ico surface with 7 iterations of refinement (lots of
vertices!), you then locate the nearest vertex in each subject
Dear Doug et al,
surfglm looks good. I have processed 10 controls and 8 patients such that
each surface contains a whole cortical surface, without the usual split
through the corpus callosum. How would I use the surface registration
process? Should I use 'ico' as the average or can I use one
