can you send it with the neighbor threshold at it's default value (1).
thanks,
Bruce
On
Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Xiangchuan Chen wrote:
Hi Bruce,
The content of the log file is listed below. Thanks for your help.
Xiangchuan
##
Date: 2002-11-01Time: 17:04:00
From: Bruce Fischl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To: freesurfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on segmentation
can you send it with the neighbor threshold at it's default value (1).
thanks,
Bruce
On
Fri, 1 Nov 2002
/sheng_new/mri/filled...
filling took 5.8 minutes
Command Finished
Start Of Original Message
Date: 2002-11-01Time: 17:04:00
From: Bruce Fischl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To: freesurfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on segmentation
can you send
: Re: Question on segmentation
it looks fine. Does the filled volume have your editing changes in it?
= End Of Original Message =
Hi all,
I found that the segmentation of the white matter near the occipital pole of my data
was not quite accurate. I tried to add some voxels to the wm volume there, but the
FreeSurfer didn't take them into account. Then, how can I improve the segmentation at
this part of brain?
Thanks,
