[Freeswitch-users] Yet another question about A500 + FS

2009-08-23 Thread Vassil Panayotov
Hi, I managed to get our A500 running with FreeSWITCH 1.0.4 stable using wanpipe 3.4.4 drivers. But now I have another problem... I want to originate calls through event socket, and I only want to receive ANSWERED(+OK) reply when the user actually answers. Now the situation is:

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Inboud Call Queue

2009-08-23 Thread Diego Viola
Hi guys, I was wondering if some of you run FreeSWITCH on a call center environment, I ask this because I plan to do that soon and I was wondering how well mod_fifo works for queues, etc. Thanks, Diego On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Saeed Ahmedsaeedahmad1...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Seven

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Inboud Call Queue

2009-08-23 Thread Jason White
Diego Viola diego.vi...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering if some of you run FreeSWITCH on a call center environment, I ask this because I plan to do that soon and I was wondering how well mod_fifo works for queues, etc. This was mentioned on the list once before, and it might be what you want:

[Freeswitch-users] Starting Freeswitch using Intercom

2009-08-23 Thread Edmar Cruz
Hi, I dont know how can I start Freeswitch using Intercom device, can you help me on this? Is there an alternative software like X-Lite but only when I press call on the Intercom device? Thanks, Edmar -- View this message in context:

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Inboud Call Queue

2009-08-23 Thread Diego Viola
Looks nice, is anyone running that in production? On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Jason White ja...@jasonjgw.net wrote: Diego Viola diego.vi...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering if some of you run FreeSWITCH on a call center environment, I ask this because I plan to do that soon and I was

Re: [Freeswitch-users] MFC-R2 support for FreeSWITCH

2009-08-23 Thread Arnaldo de Moraes Pereira
Thanks a lot, moy, this is great. I'll check to see if there's somewhere I can test it. On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Diego Viola diego.vi...@gmail.com wrote: Nice work, keep up the great work :). On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Moises Silvamoises.si...@gmail.com wrote: So, I finally

[Freeswitch-users] FXO and analogue phones

2009-08-23 Thread Merul Patel
I have a Freeswitch setup working on an Alix embedded platform in conjunction with a USB FXO device from Sangoma. My goal is to be able to either answer incoming calls on a softphone or on a POTS handset elsewhere in the building, and to also be able to make outgoing calls from either. For

[Freeswitch-users] problem compiling esl for use with freepbx v3

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
Okay, just finished installing 1.0.4 from tarball on Ubuntu 9.0.4 server, then went to install FreePBX v3, I've gotten all the prerequisities in the wizard fixed except for ESL As per http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Event_Socket_Library http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Event_Socket I go into

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Choppy voive in conference from fritzbox to freeswitch (ptime:30 msecs)

2009-08-23 Thread Peter P GMX
Hello Anthony, I set p...@30i,p...@30i and I can see in the logs that PCMA is used. However ptime is set to 20 msec as shown in the Logs: 2009-08-23 22:11:29.530301 [DEBUG] sofia.c:3309 Remote SDP: v=0 o=user 2075230 2075230 IN IP4 217.xx.xx.xxx s=call c=IN IP4 217.xx.xx.xxx t=0 0 m=audio 7078

[Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
I've got 1.0.4 running with zrtp on ubuntu 9.0.4. I have 3 zrtp capable endpoints: an xp desktop running ekiga with the 0.92 build 218 zfone client, 2 cell phones running ver 2.0.5 of the Tivi softphone: a nokia e61i (symbian s60) and an O2 Xda Flame (windows mobile 5). All 3 endpoints are

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
This is because you didn't install the zrtpagent.lua script and dial zrtp on your keypad to enroll the FS box as a trusted man in the middle... which btw will only work with the unreleased zfone3. /b On Aug 23, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: I've got 1.0.4 running with zrtp on

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
Brian, okay, that answers the case with FS acting as a trusted man in the middle, but what about in the peer to peer case? Shouldn't FS just be passing the ztrp traffic through to the endpoints? Or am I misunderstanding how it's supposed to work? Secondly where would I find info about

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
On Aug 23, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: Brian, okay, that answers the case with FS acting as a trusted man in the middle, but what about in the peer to peer case? Shouldn't FS just be passing the ztrp traffic through to the endpoints? Or am I misunderstanding how it's

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
On 23 Aug 2009 at 17:48, Brian West wrote: Nope. FreeSWITCH is a b2bua so the traffic is decrypted... and Hadn't heard that term before http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back-to-back_user_agent that clears it up. Any plans to offer straight proxy/passthru? relayed and encrypted again to

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Raymond Chandler
Could you load freeswitch with a couple hundred calls then run the test again.. and do the same to asterisk and see how the numbers stack up then? I'm just curious to see what happens at that point. -Ray On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote: Hi Everyone, I'm working on a PBX

[Freeswitch-users] Couple of questions

2009-08-23 Thread Matt Riddell
Hi, I don't see how I can read some responses to command using esl. I.E. esl_send_recv(handle, api show calls count\n\n); and printf(Header Test %s\n, esl_event_get_header(event, API-Command)); printf(Body Test %s\n, esl_event_get_body(event)); the header details are returned. The body is

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread SP
Don't forget to press tab at the asterisk console! :) On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 18:23, Raymond Chandler intralan...@freeswitch.orgwrote: Could you load freeswitch with a couple hundred calls then run the test again.. and do the same to asterisk and see how the numbers stack up then? I'm just

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
I can confirm that it works 100% correct passing the SAS across the bridge correctly once you trust the switch in the middle. /b On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: ahh, it's zrtp_agent.lua which is why I didn't find it. I'll add that into the mix and cross my fingers

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Couple of questions

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: Hi, I don't see how I can read some responses to command using esl. I.E. esl_send_recv(handle, api show calls count\n\n); and printf(Header Test %s\n, esl_event_get_header(event, API- Command)); printf(Body Test %s\n,

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
On 23 Aug 2009 at 16:16, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: ahh, it's zrtp_agent.lua which is why I didn't find it. I'll add that into the mix and cross my fingers that zfone3 gets released soon along with it's inclusion into the softphones I have on my smartphone devices. Well good news for the

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
Wish they would send me one for my E63 for testing... only been working with zfone 3 so far. /b On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:50 PM, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: Well good news for the Tiviphone client ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Couple of questions

2009-08-23 Thread Matt Riddell
On 24/08/09 11:50 AM, Brian West wrote: Even if I could read some comments from a usage of it would be useful. I just find it interesting you're doing this with C. :) The rest of the application is in C, so it makes sense to use FreeSwitch's esl in C. Thanks for your help man will let you

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
They have a trial version of the full client available from their website, I think it's only for 10 days though. I suspect if you approached them, they'd probably give you a full client for permanent use for interoperability testing. http://www.tivi.com/en/download/credit_paypal.php Opps, my

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
On Aug 23, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: added following line to /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/lua.conf.xml WRONG. !--param name=startup-script value=zrtp_agent.lua/-- Don't touch this. under this section !-- The following options identifies

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
On 23 Aug 2009 at 19:53, Brian West wrote: Just put it into the scripts folder and run it from the dialplan see default configs. !-- install zrtp_agent.lua into scripts (ZRTP == 9787) -- extension name=zrtp_enrollement condition field=destination_number

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
Ahh, I didn't quite clue-in that I had to run the additional installers as below when the main compile finished, I thought it was saying it had already done that. Makes perfect sense in hindsite ;-) + FreeSWITCH install Complete --+ + FreeSWITCH has been successfully

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
Whoah. 2009-08-23 20:07:52.583524 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:602 New Channel sofia/internal/1...@192.168.73.45 [4ff9d452-905b-11de-8c5d-d333d780ffc7] 2009-08-23 20:07:52.740094 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:315 Processing 1001- 9787 in context default 2009-08-23 20:07:52.980164 [NOTICE]

[Freeswitch-users] Screaming monkeys on ext 5000

2009-08-23 Thread Scott Torr
Just a quick note, and I'm sure why, but screaming monkeys does not play on the the default installation. I have not looked into why, but thought I would just quickly let you know. Perhaps I have not done something? regards, sbt ___ FreeSWITCH-users

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Screaming monkeys on ext 5000

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
On Aug 23, 2009, at 10:26 PM, Scott Torr wrote: Just a quick note, and I'm sure why, but screaming monkeys does not play on the the default installation. It requires internet connectivity. It calls a remote system to play which is out of our control. I have not looked into why, but

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Media Not Heard When Bridging 2 Calls with same Gateway

2009-08-23 Thread Jim Burke
If I understand your issue correctly, it sounds to me like FS is not set to anchor the RTP media stream. Experience suggests that most SBC's do not like trying to loopback RTP traffic to themselves. Check to see what IP address's are getting used in the c=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for the INVITE and 200OK

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Call exits after 120 seconds with hangup cause

2009-08-23 Thread Jim Burke
In your SIP profiles this could be set. I beleive 120 is the default setting. param name=session-timeout value=120 On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:35 PM, bakkoasannu...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have those lines in switch.conf file?    !--RTP port range --    param name=rtp-start-port value=1/

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Couple of questions

2009-08-23 Thread João Mesquita
Hey there, FsGui uses ESL a lot and I had to go through the code to document it so here is a few hints inline ... Don't hesitate to keep the questions coming. I will fill in whenever I can. jmesquita On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Brian West br...@freeswitch.org wrote: On Aug 23, 2009, at

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transporting SIP over TCP

2009-08-23 Thread Jim Burke
X-Lite does support TCP, however you need to have NAPTR and SRV DNS entries. It used to support TLS, but this seems to have been removed :( sip.mydomain.net. IN NAPTR 0 0 s SIPS+D2T _sips._tcp.sip.mydomain.net. sip.mydomain.net. IN NAPTR 1 0 s SIP+D2T _sip._tcp.sip.mydomain.net.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Rogelio Perez
Thanks Andrew and Anthony, I created a ramdisk for the db and log directories using tmpfs and now I see better performance times: startup:15.6 sec. call extension: 0 sec. shutdown: 7.5 sec reload config: 0 sec. I have noticed that during the startup there is a

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transporting SIP over TCP

2009-08-23 Thread Jim Burke
Well if you append ;transport=tcp on the bridge lines it will use TCP IMHO this statement needs some clarification based on the context of this thread. If the destination is another PBX or Freeswitch box then this is ok as FS will be initiating the TCP connection. For terminating calls to

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
freeswitch -nonat /b On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote: 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910459 [ERR] switch_nat.c:183 Error checking for PMP [general error] 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910694 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:397 Checking for UPnP 2009-08-24 04:39:41.906029 [INFO] switch_nat.c:411 No PMP

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transporting SIP over TCP

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West
It already does exactly this. /b On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:49 PM, Jim Burke wrote: For terminating calls to registered User Agents (UA) the decision to use TCP or UDP should be made using information collected when the UA registered. i.e if the UA registers using TCP, FS should use TCP to

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Transporting SIP over TCP

2009-08-23 Thread Jim Burke
I always expected it did :) My point was that you cannot put transport=TCP on a bridge statement line to an internal registered client and expect it to use a protocol that was not used at registration. Hence the clarification based on the context of the thread :) On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:53

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Rogelio Perez
Thanks Brian, now the startup time is 3 sec. On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:52 AM, Brian West wrote: freeswitch -nonat /b On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote: 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910459 [ERR] switch_nat.c:183 Error checking for PMP [general error] 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910694 [DEBUG]

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zrtp endpoints have different sas through fs 1.0.4

2009-08-23 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
On 23 Aug 2009 at 20:22, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: Whoah. I get audio now, but it's running really slooowly. I'd say about 1/4 to 1/8 normal speech speed Hmmm, using one of my hardphones, specifically the Integrated Networks IN- 1002 2009-08-23 20:46:07.334596 [NOTICE]