[Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Jason White
Revision 15904 is fine, but after upgrading to revision 16003 I get the following. 1. No problems with a FreeSWITCH to FreeSWITCH call (Celt codec). 2. A PCMU call to a SIP provider is fine for the first 20 to 30 seconds, then the audio breaks up completely. I have ZRTP compiled in, if that

Re: [Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Michael Jerris
The best help to track this down is to try to identify the specific svn revision that caused the issue and to supply a full freeswitch debug with sip trace. Mike On Dec 19, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Jason White ja...@jasonjgw.net wrote: Revision 15904 is fine, but after upgrading to revision 16003

Re: [Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
Also retest with no zrtp send a full console debug log with sip trace On Dec 19, 2009 8:33 AM, Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com wrote: The best help to track this down is to try to identify the specific svn revision that caused the issue and to supply a full freeswitch debug with sip trace. Mike

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
how are you parking it? do you have a debug log showing it happen? On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Ron McLeod ron.freeswi...@mcleodnet.comwrote: Is there any way to park a channel without causing pre-answer (resulting is a SIP 183 Session Progress)? Thanks, Ron

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Metik
Bill, I think you would add this to the user profile in the directory. The brian.xml example (located in ${confdir}/directory/) provided with the default/sample configuration files demonstrates how to to do this by introducing a cidr attribute to the the user element. Example: user

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Allow/Deny REGISTER Request Based on User-Agent Header

2009-12-19 Thread Peter P GMX
we do this based XML-Curl. Jerry Richards schrieb: Is it possible to allow/deny REGISTER requests based on the User-Agent header? I need to know/manage what devices are registering. Best Regards, Jerry ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Metik
I noticed a typo in my post that may easily confuse someone... user id=7105551212 cidr=127.0.0.0/8// should be: user id=7105551212 cidr=127.0.0.0/8 -metik Metik wrote: Bill, I think you would add this to the user profile in the directory. The brian.xml example (located in

Re: [Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
I tried a patch out of pure deduction and speculation from your post. Can you update and test it for me please? On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Anthony Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote: Also retest with no zrtp send a full console debug log with sip trace On Dec 19, 2009 8:33

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
This is what I am doing . DIALPLAN ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? include context name=mytest extension name=mytest condition field=destination_number expression=^.*$ action application=park/ /condition /extension /context /include NETWORK

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Frank Carmickle
Good afternoon By default the internal profile is looking to have authed calls. If you want you can set an acl. Look at autoload_configs/acl.conf.xml. Also remember to set the context in the profile so that the dialplan for that context will be parsed. If you decide to register to it you

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
My issue has nothing to do with registration or authentication. I am simply looking for a way to park a new call without having the call pre-answered (I don't want a SIP 183 sent back to the client). Ron -Original Message- From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org

[Freeswitch-users] Third Party device connectivity from Freeswitch

2009-12-19 Thread Scott Fernandez
Hi, Is there a way to have the Freeswitch to route the calls to physical device/phone rather than just routing the calls to soft phones like Xlite?. If available, What sort of settings that are required in Freeswitch to communicate with third party applications/hardwares (like PBX) so that the

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Third Party device connectivity from Freeswitch

2009-12-19 Thread Frank Carmickle
On Sun, Dec 20, Scott Fernandez wrote: Hi, Is there a way to have the Freeswitch to route the calls to physical device/phone rather than just routing the calls to soft phones like Xlite?. Very much so. It all depends on what you want to do. If available, What sort of settings that are

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Bill W.
Hey Metik, Yes. Well, actually, I can have the cidr in two places in the directory. user cidr=190.218.97.83/32 id=testphone01 params param name=auth-acl value=190.218.97.83/32/param From what I understand the cidr= parmeter is used in conjunction with the apply-inbound-acl parameter in

[Freeswitch-users] Difference between ESL execute() and executeAsync()

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
I don't notice any different in behavior between execute() and executeAsync(). I was expecting that executeAsync() would return right-away, and that execute() would only return after the specified application runs to completion (CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE event). Running the sample app below, I

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Difference between ESL execute() andexecuteAsync()

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
Here's the ES network trace: Content-Length: 1502 Content-Type: text/event-plain Event-Name: CHANNEL_STATE Core-UUID: bb9ea62a-ed02-11de-91b1-8b7cb185f66f FreeSWITCH-Hostname: ron-laptop FreeSWITCH-IPv4: 192.168.100.132 FreeSWITCH-IPv6: %3A%3A1 Event-Date-Local: 2009-12-19%2019%3A12%3A09

[Freeswitch-users] [OT] Re: Scanning my firewall for open UDP ports?

2009-12-19 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Hristo Benev f...@abv.bg wrote: Just for your information there is a version of nmap for windows. So you can do the test from your desktop. Funny that you assume his desktop is running Windows (maybe it is). I would have guessed that the average person on this

Re: [Freeswitch-users] [OT] Re: Scanning my firewall for open UDP ports?

2009-12-19 Thread Jason White
Gabriel Gunderson g...@gundy.org wrote: Funny that you assume his desktop is running Windows (maybe it is). I would have guessed that the average person on this list doesn't run Windows on the desktop. But, what do I know? Some of us on the list have never run Windows on anything. It's