: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Re-invite
are you doing this trace from the freeswitch box itself?
Mike
On Dec 17, 2009, at 10:48 AM, DJB wrote:
Anthony,
I have pasted the invite sip trace here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11536
Please advise if you need further info.
Thank you
.
Mike
On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:10 AM, DJB wrote:
Mike,
My latest traces that I captured were done within the FS box:
http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11541
Thank you,
Dorn B.
From: Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Thu
.
Mike
On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:10 AM, DJB wrote:
Mike,
My latest traces that I captured were done within the FS box:
http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11541
Thank you,
Dorn B.
From: Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Thu
through the trace, can you clarify where the missing invite is? I think
I see everything in the sofia trace.
Mike
On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:10 AM, DJB wrote:
Mike,
My latest traces that I captured were done within the FS box:
http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11541
Thank you,
Dorn B
, 2009 3:42:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Re-invite
that means the invite is not matching the call dialog
compare the via tags and call-id etc
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:29 PM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
We have a customer that we are sending calls to off the FS and here is the
issue
, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:48 AM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
Anthony,
I have pasted the invite sip trace here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11536
Please advise if you need further info.
Thank you.
From: Anthony Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com
on that port anymore (can other calls go through?) or the packet
you see in tcpdump is not really going to the right port. Can you confirm
which one?
Mike
On Dec 16, 2009, at 6:29 PM, DJB wrote:
We have a customer that we are sending calls to off the FS and here is the
issue:
Call
on the actual FS box using tshark or tcpdump?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:48 AM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
Anthony,
I have pasted the invite sip trace here: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11536
Please advise if you need further info.
Thank you.
From
I am sorry; here is the complete one: http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11540
Thank you.
From: DJB djbin...@yahoo.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 9:35:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Re-invite
Anthony/Michael
We
have a customer that we are sending calls to off the FS and here is the issue:
Call
is initially setup fine and they send a first re-invite with media 0.0.0.0 to
place the caller on hold. FS sends a 200 ok to this first re-invite fine
They
then send a second re-invite with their media IP
:29 PM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
We
have a customer that we are sending calls to off the FS and here is the issue:
Call
is initially setup fine and they send a first re-invite with media 0.0.0.0 to
place the caller on hold. FS sends a 200 ok to this first re-invite fine
They
then send
priority enabled.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:42 AM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
One thing that I forgot to mention, these 2 FreeSWITCH servers are getting
calls with load balancing from another switch. Thus, the traffic type are
pretty much identical and both FSs have exactly the same
.
From: DJB djbin...@yahoo.com
To: FREESWITCH-USERS MAILING LIST freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 5:17:14 PM
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Question regarding running FreeSWITCH with high
priority enabled.
I have 2 identical Dell PowerEdge 1950 servers
with a
large payout when scaling to many calls.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:42 AM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
One thing that I forgot to mention, these 2 FreeSWITCH servers are getting
calls with load balancing from another switch. Thus, the traffic type are
pretty much identical and both FSs
We have FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4 (exported) running at a high volume traffic.
I normally check the concurrent calls by looking at the number of sessions from
status command. However, the number of concurrent calls in FS is normally
higher than it's supposed to be after we ran traffic for
I have 2 identical Dell PowerEdge 1950 servers running FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4
(exported) with only one thing difference which is the first one is running
with -hp enabled; however, I have noticed that the one with -hp option consumed
double in memory usage than the other one.
I wonder
Anthony,
Would this configuration work if we want to do load sharing 50/50:
#distributor.conf.xml
configuration name=distributor.conf description=Distributor Configuration
lists
list name=carrier1 total-weight=2
node name=gateway1 weight=1/
node name=gateway2 weight=1/
=bridge
data=sofia/gateway/${distributor(carrier1)}/$1/
/condition
/extension
/include
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:19 PM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
Anthony,
Would this configuration work if we want to do load sharing 50/50:
#distributor.conf.xml
configuration name=distributor.conf
Actually, I got it. I've added: applications/mod_distributor in the
modules.conf
I will start testing now.
Thank you,
Dorn B.
From: DJB djbin...@yahoo.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Wed, November 11, 2009 11:57:29 AM
Subject: Re
I am also curious whether you can recommend how I can get the info if I want to
see concurrent calls by account code. Let's say if I am running FS as SBC and
I want to monitor concurrent calls per customer. I've looked at the HEARTBEAT,
but it only gives me overall session-count.
How safe is
Any suggestion from anyone please?
Thank you,
Dorn B
- Original Message
From: DJB djbin...@yahoo.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Fri, October 30, 2009 11:31:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch in signaling path only
Now i have as follows, but it's
@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 11:40:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] CDR CSV variables
you can make up your own variable and set whatever you want in there then add
it to the template.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:04 AM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
I wonder if I don't want to have b
to the same email asking us to hurry up an answer
you faster its only monday morning here.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:56 AM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any suggestion from anyone please?
Thank you,
Dorn B
- Original Message
From: DJB djbin...@yahoo.com
To: freeswitch-users
I am wondering why I cannot do as condition#2.
For Lua in dialplan, when I have the followings:
--WORKING--
(Condition#1)
.
.
session:execute(set,bypass_media=true)
session:execute(set,hangup_after_bridge=true)
session:execute(set,continue_on_fail=true)
.
.
are answered.
Set bypass_media b4 each bridge. It is unsetting on you and setting
bypass_media_after_bridge because you already answered the channel running
the lua script.
On October 30, 2009 12:03:29 pm DJB wrote:
I am wondering why I cannot do as condition#2.
For Lua in dialplan, when I have
anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote:
I think session timers will use invite if there is no update.
the session-timeout profile param should control that but you have to double
the number you actually want because it sends the new invite at the halfway
point.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:29 PM, DJB djbin
-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Mon, October 26, 2009 11:45:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP UPDATE Method
what exactly are you expecting to use it for?
We never really supported it anyway.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:19 PM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
I wonder whether you
I wonder if he run "make current" from his 1.0.4 source file, it should update to the current trunk, wasn't it?Dorn.From: Diego Viola diego.vi...@gmail.comTo: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.orgSent: Thu, October 22, 2009 10:15:21 PMSubject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Core Dump question!He's running
We have about 1500 concurrent calls on the server. And, the CPU usage is shown
below:
02:06:46 AM CPU %user %nice%sys %iowait%irq %soft %steal
%idleintr/s
02:06:46 AM all0.060.000.030.440.000.000.00
99.47 1028.25
02:06:46 AM00.08
Hello,
I am trying to use luasql with freeswitch but having a hard time compile it
with x86_64 Server running CentOS 5.3
Linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
GNU/Linux
[r...@fsx1 luasql-2.1.1]# make
export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3; gcc -O2 -Wall
If anyone ran into the same problem, here is the fix that I got from [stkn] on
IRC:
make CFLAGS=-O2 -fPIC
I hope it might help someone in the future.
Regards.
- Original Message
From: DJB djbin...@yahoo.com
To: FREESWITCH-USERS MAILING LIST freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
I am not sure if my question did not get post correctly earlier. I wonder
whether anyone can give me any recommendations.
Here is the call flow:
I call from the PSTN (A party) into my Polycom phone (B-party) which is
registered to FreeSwtich. The Freeswtich is setup not to route media as I
I have a call transfer problem with Freeswitch
Here is the call flow:
I call from the PSTN (A party) into my Polycom phone (B-party) which is
registered to FreeSwtich. The Freeswtich is setup not to route media as I have
an SBC acting as a mirror proxy that will do all the NAT and media
33 matches
Mail list logo
