Shahzad shaherya...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS performance under windows
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 4:00 AM
If you want to try FS on Windows only for feature testing etc. then its okay,
however for production deployments
I know people that have deployed on windows... not a huge problem just
hasn't been load tested like linux... we don't have the resources or
time to load test every single platform, tune and tweak it. The
community can help out with this area a lot.
/b
On Sep 2, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Diego
I have a production application where I use FS as part of small, custom ACD
solution, with about 80 incoming DIDs and 4 agent positions. It's been
deployed for about 4 months now, and was in beta long before that... So
far, excellent perfomrance on Windows 2003 server, 32-bit, with 4GB of
Hi folk,
First of all, thank you for FS - really strong project.
I have already asked this once in other thread but didn't got any answer.
So, I'll try to re-ask.
We are playing currently with FS under Windows 2008 64bit. So far there are
some issues but I hope we'll solve it in nearest future.
If you want to try FS on Windows only for feature testing etc. then its
okay, however for production deployments (that includes load testing) i
strongly recommend CentOS 5.x.
As far as configuration migration is concerned, you don't need to change any
configuration files, simply copy them to
Thank you!
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Kadantsev
http://www.doxwox.com - Best web meeting and online collaboration tool.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Muhammad Shahzad
shaherya...@googlemail.com wrote:
If you want to try FS on Windows only for feature testing etc. then its
okay, however for
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS performance under windows
If you want to try FS on Windows only for feature testing etc. then its okay,
however for production deployments (that includes load testing) i strongly
recommend CentOS 5.x.
As far
Have you gotten past the problems with pthread-win32 on 64 bit? you will need
the trunk version of that library if not because the released version has
problems with 64bit.
There are some other simple compilation problems I assume you may have
already got past? If not see
