Re: [Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request

2009-10-16 Thread Michael Jerris
There was just a bunch of work on UPDATE, can you confirm this is the same behavior with trunk? On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Peter P GMX wrote: Hello, we have the following problem. 2 Fax machines are communicating via Freeswitch. One is externally attached via a Telco who is able to

Re: [Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request

2009-10-16 Thread Peter P GMX
Hello Michael this is a productive system, so I can currently not update to the current trunk. But the installed SVN is 14741. Were those changes after 14741? Then I'll try to find a timeslot at night in order to update freeswitch. But Freeswitch should forward the UPDATE request in proxy-media

Re: [Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request

2009-10-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
I'm sure it won't work because we only implemented forwarding t38 with invite it would require adding code to say the least. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Peter P GMX prometheus...@gmx.net wrote: Hello Michael this is a productive system, so I can currently not update to the current

[Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request

2009-10-14 Thread Peter P GMX
Hello, we have the following problem. 2 Fax machines are communicating via Freeswitch. One is externally attached via a Telco who is able to handle T.38. The other one is attached locally. When 2 Fax machines start syncing each other, the Telco sends a SIP UPDATE message with T.38 SDP, as it