Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-10-02 Thread RobertT
Hi folks! Suddenly I found this http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2009-February/002015.htmltopic and that explains a lot. From there I see that sofia sends refresher messages for NATed client in order to check if it still alive. It means I have problems in my client. Sorry for

Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-10-01 Thread RobertT
I am still experiencing problem with lost media in conference on a client behind NAT. This is what I've done - disabled VAD on a NATed client and asked my friend to produce lots of animal sounds in order to keep channel busy. But at the end of minute sounds of wild nature disapeared again. We

Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-10-01 Thread RobertT
And here is a short piece of log from the server side: ... nua(): refersh session after 62 seconds (in [55..65])... send INVITE ... rcv OK... send ACK... rcv BYE... I see now that sdp for natted client has additional lines in OK response compared to client with public ip. Session-Expires:

[Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-09-29 Thread RobertT
I am a bit confused with what's going on in a following scenario. I have a public FS server with a public conference, that clients are connecting to with my softphone. All of this softphones have STUN option enabled and working, effectively resolving client's public IP address. They also have ICE

Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-09-29 Thread Jason White
RobertT siniy...@gmail.com wrote: Where is the problem? Is it NAT, closing RTP port after some silence period from client? It could be a time-out, i.e., the nat router isn't keeping the port translation alive. I don't like nat at all. As more people migrate to IPv6 the problem will gradually

Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-09-29 Thread RobertT
Are there ways to escape this timeouts exchanging RTP with FS? Why didn't waste flag help? Maybe I should flood channel in both directions? Will CNG on a client side be a good descision? =) ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-09-29 Thread Dmitry Kadantsev
ты все еще наблюдаешь эту проблему? я думал она уже решена... эни вей, я уже приехал и сделаю скоро воторой IP нам для собственного STUN-сервера. -- Best regards, Dmitry Kadantsev http://www.doxwox.com - Best web meeting and online collaboration tool. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM, RobertT

Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-09-29 Thread RobertT
в том то все и дело что с тобой мы эту проблему вроде как решили, а у Юры ее никогда не было. и тут на тебе... ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users

Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference participant from behind NAT

2009-09-29 Thread Michael Jerris
Most likely the client NAT is cutting off the translation due to no traffic. This could be because the client is not sending any traffic, regardless of settings you set on FreeSWITCH. Try disabling all vad and dtx on your soft phone to see if this helps. Also, your email seems to