-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] ptime problem with provider (Cisco hardware)
I am not a Cisco expert, but as far as I know packetization period is
configurable in Cisco. When you specify the codec for a dial peer, you can
set up the ptime value in milliseconds
Brian West pisze:
Well you can't have ptime 60 one way and 20 the other it just won't
work. Also I can't even think that this illegal codec was even tested
at 60ms... Try it with ulaw and see what it does. or only allow
g...@60i and see what it does.
I made some tests with ulaw with
I am not a Cisco expert, but as far as I know packetization period is
configurable in Cisco. When you specify the codec for a dial peer, you
can set up the ptime value in milliseconds. This is an optional
argument in the Cisco command line and what happens when providers
don't specify it is that
Try:
param name=inbound-codec-negotiation value=scrooge/
/b
On Mar 19, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Łukasz Czerpak wrote:
Is there any solution of this problem?
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Brian West wrote:
Try:
param name=inbound-codec-negotiation value=scrooge/
*
Unfortunately there is no difference when it is set to 'scrooge' or
other value :(
regards,
Lukasz
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Hi,
This is a known issue with some of these platforms but for
completeness can you send the actual SDP?
2009/3/19 Łukasz Czerpak luk...@czerpak.eu:
Hi,
I have some troubles with provider configuration. The are warnings in logs:
2009-03-19 19:02:48 [WARNING] mod_sofia.c:739
Brian West wrote:
what rev are you on?
trunk - ~2009-03-15 21:00
regards,
Łukasz
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
The issue I seen was they invite to you with NO ptime which indicates
20ms, they should invite with ptime:60 if they want 60.
/b
On Mar 19, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Łukasz Czerpak wrote:
I've just tested g...@60i and everything works perfect - thank you
very
much. I didn't test ulaw.
What is
Brian West wrote:
The issue I seen was they invite to you with NO ptime which indicates
20ms, they should invite with ptime:60 if they want 60.
I see but there is any solution to bypass this provider's
incompatibility? I want to stay with this provider anyway - he has
very good quality
Well you said you were using G.729 for testing... when you're clearly
not... but I told you already how to fix it... for that IP or peer
g...@60i
/b
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Łukasz Czerpak wrote:
I see but there is any solution to bypass this provider's
incompatibility? I want to stay
10 matches
Mail list logo
