Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-26 Thread Ismail Donmez
27 Kas 2006 Pts 00:23 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız: > > Same in ftview, attached is the screenshot of > > > > ftview -m "MENNO" ppem ~/buggy-font/verdanab.ttf > > Hmrpf. The picture you've sent to the list shows the the > *anti-aliased* version. Just press the `a' key to get the correct > render

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Same in ftview, attached is the screenshot of > > ftview -m "MENNO" ppem ~/buggy-font/verdanab.ttf Hmrpf. The picture you've sent to the list shows the the *anti-aliased* version. Just press the `a' key to get the correct rendering result. I can only repeat that this font cannot be rendere

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-26 Thread Ismail Donmez
26 Kas 2006 Paz 00:19 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız: > > Uhm I just looked again in kfontview with latest CVS and bold N > > character still have the same problem. > > What about ftview? Same in ftview, attached is the screenshot of ftview -m "MENNO" ppem ~/buggy-font/verdanab.ttf Regards, isma

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Uhm I just looked again in kfontview with latest CVS and bold N > character still have the same problem. What about ftview? Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-25 Thread Ismail Donmez
25 Kas 2006 Cts 02:10 tarihinde, Werner LEMBERG şunları yazmıştı: > > Is the bug supposed to be fixed now? > > Yes, it is fixed -- I just tried again. > > > Becase I can still reproduce with latest CVS. > > What exactly can you reproduce? Note that grayscale rendering in the > range 9-16 ppem is

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Is the bug supposed to be fixed now? Yes, it is fixed -- I just tried again. > Becase I can still reproduce with latest CVS. What exactly can you reproduce? Note that grayscale rendering in the range 9-16 ppem is *unusable* with this font! You have to follow the recommendations from the `ga

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-24 Thread Ismail Donmez
22 Kas 2006 Çar 12:36 tarihinde, Werner LEMBERG şunları yazmıştı: > > Currently, I can't debug the fpgm/prep tables with FontForge because > > it crashes. Rogier, maybe this information gives you further hints. > > It seems that we have wrong assumptions on the storage area, and how > > RS/WS int

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Currently, I can't debug the fpgm/prep tables with FontForge because > it crashes. Rogier, maybe this information gives you further hints. > It seems that we have wrong assumptions on the storage area, and how > RS/WS interact with the CVT. George provided a quick patch, so I was able to debug

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-18 Thread Rogier van Dalen
On 11/14/06, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Attached is a screenshot of kfontviewer showing Verdana Bold at > > > some sizes. Notice that 2nd and 3rd entries show that "N" > > > character is badly displayed. > > > > Confirmed. David's latest changes to the bytecode interpreter (

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-14 Thread David Turner
I don't have much time at the moment, though I just finished a large commit spree recently. Even though I'd like to investigate this problem in parallel with the "enhancement bugs" we have in the interpreter, I really feel we should prepare for a new release before that. More on this later, - Dav

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I don't have much time at the moment, though I just finished a large > commit spree recently. Even though I'd like to investigate this > problem in parallel with the "enhancement bugs" we have in the > interpreter, I really feel we should prepare for a new release > before that. OK. > PS: By t