Re: [Inquiry] Auto-fit on monochrome output

2023-11-08 Thread Lawrence D'Oliveiro
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:27:03 +0800, Jm Moon wrote: > ahh it's on the very legacy display, which is monochrome at 72dpi > we have no choice but to find out what can be done to improve the > appearance Hand-tuned bitmap fonts.

Re: [Inquiry] Auto-fit on monochrome output

2023-11-08 Thread Jm Moon
> Define 'improve hinting'. It's not clear to me what you actually want to achieve. Currently we are using FT_LOAD_RENDER | FT_LOAD_TARGET_MONO | FT_LOAD_MONOCHROME and still seeing very bad appearance So not sure if I missed anything there in order for the monochrome character to look nicer?

Re: [Inquiry] Auto-fit on monochrome output

2023-11-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Define 'improve hinting'. It's not clear to me what you actually >> want to achieve. > > Currently we are using FT_LOAD_RENDER | FT_LOAD_TARGET_MONO | > FT_LOAD_MONOCHROME and still seeing very bad appearance. So not > sure if I missed anything there in order for the monochrome > character to

Re: [Inquiry] Auto-fit on monochrome output

2023-11-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> ahh it's on the very legacy display, which is monochrome at 72dpi >> we have no choice but to find out what can be done to improve the >> appearance > > Hand-tuned bitmap fonts. Yeah, and you should additionally use well-hinted Windows fonts that contain support for monochrome rendering.

Re: [Inquiry] Auto-fit on monochrome output

2023-11-08 Thread Jm Moon
ahh it's on the very legacy display, which is monochrome at 72dpi we have no choice but to find out what can be done to improve the appearance Thank You. Best Regards JM Moon On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 16:25, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> Define 'improve hinting'. It's not clear to me what you