Re: [ft] otf autohint/nohint problem

2005-11-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I think that use of a font that needs a module that has been removed should result in an error code. Normally, it does. The exception is the hinter which isn't needed. Are you saying that pshinter is not needed to render the font? Yes. I think it is for the trade gothic font

Re: [ft] otf autohint/nohint problem

2005-11-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Suppose you ran a program like ftview to render the whole font to a bitmap with each hint option, at a large point size like 64. Would they be the same? This would have caught the bug/regression you fixed. Or maybe I should rephrase the question. This could be a test tool the calculates

RE: [ft-devel] Migrating layout table validation code to a new CVSmodule

2005-11-22 Thread Turner, David
OK, I'll try an explanation: FT_Add_Modules was designed to be able to register a new module after the library initialization on _embedded_ systems, you should typically do something like the following in the code that *uses* FT2: FT_Init_FreeType( library ); FT_Add_Modules( library,

Re: [ft-devel] Problem with Type 42 incremental downloading font

2005-11-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
--- freetype.h2005-08-15 16:05:44.0 -0400 +++ freetype_1.h 2005-11-21 15:49:16.0 -0500 @@ -1875,7 +1875,9 @@ const FT_Byte* file_base, FT_Long file_size, FT_Long face_index, -