You think people are too sophisticated to give money to scammers? You
must read different news articles than I do.
http://www.blongerbros.com/gang/rag.asp
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo lays out how a typical new energy device scam works:
Thanks for vivid details about how an intricate stock market scam worked in
the 1920's.
I never would have imagined such organization and attention to details.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Sarbajit Roy sroy...@gmail.com wrote:
You think people are too sophisticated to give money to
All
If interested in UI design, drill down into this --
http://interaction-design.org/
-- Tom johnson (in Zanzibar)
Understanding Social Computing:An Authoritative Review by Tom Erickson of
IBM’s Watson Research
Hi Steve,
I am not sure about Google but many Internet Groups exhibit a bit of the
conventional school yard bully tactics.
In general this Friam Group seems relatively free from that sort of thing.
At least no one is accusing me of thinking I am some Kind of Scientist
I suspect that
Being somewhat close to the problem, I'm not sure what the connection is
between this criticism and what is happening at Penn State.
Specifically, I'm not sure how it is scapegoating if the Director of
Athletics, the Vice President of Business and Finance, the legendary football
coach, and the
Nick, Eric, what do you think, does Psychology need a theory?
http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.com/2011/11/theory-and-why-its-time-psychology-got.html?m=1
-J.
Sent from Android
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays
Oh, God. Here we go.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jochen Fromm j...@cas-group.net wrote:
Nick, Eric, what do you think, does Psychology need a theory?
http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.com/2011/11/theory-and-why-its-time-psychology-got.html?m=1
-J.
Sent from Android
Between this study
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026828
reporting that
statistical errors in psych papers correlate with the unwillingness of
authors to share their original data, and the career of social psychologist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diederik_Stapel
Doug, don't fret.
The answer to Jochen's question is Yes, it is about friggin time we get a good
theory, and Andrew and Sabrina's blog is an excellent source of ideas for
improving psychology. Recently Andrew's blog has been getting attention from
other excellent professionals, including a
Eric:
I just picked up three books in order to learn more about Embodied
Cognition:
1. Embodied Cognition by Lawrence Shapiro
2. Where Mathematics Comes From by George Lakoff and Rafael E. Nunez
3. Philosophy In The Flesh by Lakoff and Mark Johnson
I came to these via Dr Lakoff's
Stephen,
I thought Lakoff's Moral politics was bloody awful - SHAMEFUL even, given
his earlier stuff which I liked. A terrifying example of what happens when
an Author's publisher gets him to write more books than he has in him.
I have to admit, I am made nervous by the notion of
Levers? There are levers? I was supposed to be pushing levers?
Dang, that explains it.
C.
On 11/12/11 9:32 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Stephen,
I thought Lakoff's Moral politics was bloody awful -- SHAMEFUL even,
given his earlier stuff which I liked. A terrifying example of what
Nick,
There are two related problems worth distinguishing.
1) The first problem is, as you put it, psychologists don’t have good
theories about the kind of questions that people want answers to. This is
indeed a problem, and is a valid criticism of some aspects of psychology / the
progress
Cousin! (if I may be so bold):
After 27 yrs in boring finance, I find these ideas, well, stimulating.
I thought Moral Politics a tough read - but only because it was densely
packed with
ideas. It seems to me the Strict Father model and the Nurturant Parent
Model explains
a lot of what passes
Yeah. I know it's dark in there, but feel around. You will find them. You
will know you have a hold of one, when you can hear the pineal gland
sloshing back and forth when you wiggle the handle. Or was it the
pituitary. Darn.
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com
15 matches
Mail list logo
