I watched the party congress in China today and thought what a difference to
the US election. In the US there was a year long multi billion dollar campaign
for each party, in China none at all. In the US we have a simple two party
system, in China a single party system. What do you think? Is
Awesome article, Steven. Congratulations!
-S
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Kotler ste...@stevenkotler.com
Date: Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:47 AM
Subject: Hacking the President's DNA—New Article
To: Stephen stephen.gue...@redfish.com
**
Hacking the President's DNA, a very
Zoosk??
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Eileen Mendel ermen...@gmail.com wrote:
**
[image: Zoosk]
[image: Eileen]
The 1 2 party systems are the only ones avoiding the pitfalls of Arrow's
Impossibility Theorem.
http://www.udel.edu/johnmack/frec444/444voting.html
But what about 2.5 parties? By this I mean guys running but with no
possibility of winning .. the so called third party candidates in the US?
According to their website it's where you can create and share your
romantic journey. It seems that FRIAM has a suitor…
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Owen Densmore o...@backspaces.net wrote:
Zoosk??
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Eileen Mendel ermen...@gmail.com wrote:
**
[image:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Robert Holmes rob...@robertholmes.org
wrote:
According to their website it's where you can create and share your
romantic journey. It seems that FRIAM has a suitor…
Ok...take a deep breath. Let's not come on too strong. And for God sakes,
don't reveal Doug too
Ditto on the congratulations to Kotler!
I have some questions for the list (composed of a mixture of optimists
and pessimists, all technophiles):
1. What do you think of Singularity University and the ideas presented
in Kotler/Diamandis' book Abundance?
2. What do you think of the
Most European countries do quite well with a multi-party system, e.g. Germany,
England, France, Poland). And a parliamentary or semi-parliamentary system is
much more responsive to public opinion than a purely presidential system.
cheers, Paul
-Original Message-
From: Owen Densmore
I'll comment again that in 1960 in Italy I was at first intrigued that
parties actually stood for something, whereas Republicans and Democrats
seemed Tweedledum and Tweedledee. However, at least at that time, Italian
politics was pretty dysfunctional in part because the hard ideological
positions
They eventually find me, no matter where I hide. Stand back, I'll take care
of this. :)
-Doug
On Nov 8, 2012 9:08 AM, Stephen Guerin stephen.gue...@redfish.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Robert Holmes rob...@robertholmes.org
wrote:
According to their website it's where you can
Owen Densmore wrote at 11/08/2012 08:36 AM:
The 1 2 party systems are the only ones avoiding the pitfalls of Arrow's
Impossibility Theorem.
http://www.udel.edu/johnmack/frec444/444voting.html
1. If and individual or group prefers A to B and B to C, then A is
preferred to C
Owen,
A math prof here gives good election year math club talk and covers Arrow's
work. While Arrow is quite correct that: democracy is mathematically
arbitrary. It is also pretty easy to demonstrate that vote for one person and
the plurality wins everything is the worst option. If you take any of
As the guy that just voted indipendendant I'm sick and tired of rebublicans
v democrats-
Sereosly? Issues seem indipendant of weather someone red, blue orange green
purple indigo-
It's one countery.
From what I gather of german polotics (for example) when there's a issue
it's just adressed without
Yes, most European countries use a multi-party system and find it acceptable.
We have too much bureaucracy in Brussels (i.e. in the EU), though. The amount
of advertising and marketing is also on a tolerable level. In the US the money
spent for political ads and campaigns is extreme. In China
Steve Smith wrote at 11/08/2012 10:37 AM:
I have some questions for the list (composed of a mixture of optimists
and pessimists, all technophiles):
1. What do you think of Singularity University and the ideas presented
in Kotler/Diamandis' book Abundance?
Will it Blend? iPad Mini vs
Fascinating. The future got here before we did.
On Nov 8, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Stephen Guerin wrote:
Awesome article, Steven. Congratulations!
-S
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's
This is something neither Europe nor China has achieved: the Apollo flight to
the moon.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/10/apollo-flight-controller-101-every-console-explained/
-Jochen
Sent from Android
FRIAM Applied
I have some questions for the list (composed of a mixture of optimists
and pessimists, all technophiles):
1. What do you think of Singularity University and the ideas presented
in Kotler/Diamandis' book Abundance?
Will it Blend? iPad Mini vs Kindle Fire HD vs Nexus 7
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:37:31AM -0700, Steve Smith wrote:
4. If not a literal Singularity, is there a subcritical Technological
Explosion underway?
The Singularity is based on the technology growth curve becoming
hyperbolic (reaching inifnity in finite time), as opposed to
exponential
I am always fascinated by spam - who makes it and why. Fully 50% of the now
significant amount of spam I get per week is from Zoosk. At what point does
this unintentionally become negative advertising?
-Arlo James Barnes
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Douglas Roberts d...@parrot-farm.netwrote:
20 matches
Mail list logo
