His asylum in Russia is temporary, it is limited to a
year. He would like to get asylum in a western country.
And most of all he would like to testify before members of
the US congress. From what I have read today, it is legally
possible that the German government denies the extradition
to the
Everybody who cares to: sign the petition.
-- Owen
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Jochen Fromm j...@cas-group.net wrote:
His asylum in Russia is temporary, it is limited to a
year. He would like to get asylum in a western country.
And most of all he would like to testify before members
On 11/2/13, 10:15 AM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
They are still in the archives of the FRIAM list, but seem to vanish
from the IMAP server.
I periodically get errors that my mail provider isn't white listed
relative to the FRIAM provider. Associated with these diagnostic
e-mails is also this
I don't know the exact reason, but it starts to frighten me. Creepy. Maybe
Snowden was right after all.
-J.
Sent from Android
Original message
From: Marcus G. Daniels mar...@snoutfarm.com
Date: 02/11/2013 17:24 (GMT+01:00)
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM]
Interestingly enough, I didn't receive Marcus' response.
-- Owen
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jochen Fromm j...@cas-group.net wrote:
I don't know the exact reason, but it starts to frighten me. Creepy. Maybe
Snowden was right after all.
-J.
Sent from Android
Original
Jochen -
I don't know the exact reason, but it starts to frighten me. Creepy.
Maybe Snowden was right after all.
I assume you meant that sarcastically... I don't think anyone has ever
suggested Snowden's disclosures were not reflecting the facts
accurately... Which makes it all the more
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Steve Smith sasm...@swcp.com wrote:
Owen -
I get a lot of FRIAM mail out of order and/or maybe with some missing
submissions that *others* apparently get. Since many here do include the
full text of the message they are replying to, I generally don't think
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:01:11AM -0600, Steve Smith wrote:
FWIW, Daniel Dennett recently claimed that 10,000 years ago humans
and their domesticated animals comprised less than 1% of the mass of
animal (not including invertebrates or ocean dwellers) of the earth
but today we, along with
Wikipedia has an interesting summary of various species' contribution to
terrestrial biomass
(linkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomass_(ecology)#Global_biomass).
The following species are each individually responsible for 30% of
terrestrial biomass:
1. humans
2. cattle
3. sheep and goats
I think they're saying that the dry biomass of terrestrial species is 30%
of the fresh biomass. Especially since the global dry biomass in million
tonnes / global wet (fresh) biomass in million tonnes = 0.3 for all
those rows in the table.
-- rec --
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Robert
Russel -
FWIW, Daniel Dennett recently claimed that 10,000 years ago humans
and their domesticated animals comprised less than 1% of the mass of
animal (not including invertebrates or ocean dwellers) of the earth
but today we, along with our livestock and pets comprise 98%... I
can't even image
Would Dennett be more trying to make a point about how we're in the
anthropocene now as opposed to our throw weight in the holocene? I
haven't been following his writings so I don't know.
And in any case we farm fish, or otherwise manipulate their populations,
so they should count as much as
My understanding is that it is renewable each year.
There is no particular evidence that his politics are especially
green. Has he said he would especially like to get asylum in a
'western' country? Why would he risk going someplace new based on a
promise of what is legally possible? Does
13 matches
Mail list logo
