No. My bad Glen. I guess I have buttons I didn't think I had ... Thanks
for the follow-up explanation. Much appreciated.
My objective, to be sure, was not seeking agreement, except on the general
concept of "being in the zone." It was they only way to be sure we could
start on the same page ...
Thank you, Vladimyr,
As any member of the local congregation will tell you, I am a sucker for the
plausible. I am also interested in bringing new blood into our conversations
and in guiding the conversations back toward complexity in order to bring back
some of the old blood that has gone
G!
New day...
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 8:30 AM ┣glen┫ wrote:
> Oops. I'm sorry if I've offended you. I am contrarian and tend to seek
> out areas of disagreement, rather than agreement.
>
> On 02/24/2017 07:14 PM, Robert Wall wrote:
> > The "as if" was the key.
Hi Glen,
This sentence raises some issues that are profoundly interesting to me, because
I am interested in both terseness and precision in scientific argument.
. I should pepper my replies with more social salve like "to me" and "in my
opinion". It's difficult, though, because that
Oops. I'm sorry if I've offended you. I am contrarian and tend to seek out
areas of disagreement, rather than agreement.
On 02/24/2017 07:14 PM, Robert Wall wrote:
> The "as if" was the key. The "as if" alludes to the behavioral
> manifestation. Yes?
Yes, of course. However, this is the
Nick,
Thank-you and let's talk about the birds in their complex landscape. Are they
hatched with the neural equipment to sing... or do they discriminate their most
ideal voices from the orchestra, only after learning their father's voice?
Do they mimic the Caruso's among themselves and regale