Eric,
I doubt an idea before I ever apply for a grant. Then I deceptively claim to be
trying to replicate an authorities claims. But the devil within me recalls that
at least once maybe more often , I have noticed
that the authority’s prediction failed. That knowledge is my group’s secret
On 03/02/2017 11:04 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
> To "Peirce-up" the discussion of doubt a touch. To doubt something is to be
> unable to act as-if-it-were-true without reservation. So, for example, you do
> not doubt Newtonian mechanics under a wide range of conditions (you are
> willing to act as
Glen,
To "Peirce-up" the discussion of doubt a touch. To doubt something is to be
unable to act as-if-it-were-true without reservation. So, for example, you
do not doubt Newtonian mechanics under a wide range of conditions (you are
willing to act as if it is true under many circumstances),
Hi, everybody,
http://www2.clarku.edu/faculty/nthompson/1-websitestuff/Texts/2000-2005/Vari
ation_in_the_bout_structure.pdf
I thought that before you mathematicians completely ran off with my birds'
songs, you ought to have a concrete example in front of you.
Nick
Yes, that makes perfect sense now that you've explained it. Self-similarity is
a tricky thing and would intuitively be sensitive to the delay. One of the
interesting ideas in that paper I posted yesterday was the "Menzerath-Altmann
law", which leads to several different "fractal dimension"
