Dope. It would be really cool to read/see the further adventures of Munchy
Man and the politically-incorrect worlds he visits. Many years ago, I
worked in a Deli at a coop where one of the cashiers was my friend. We
coped by collaborating on a comic called "grisly customer death". It mostly
Duude that's a fantastic idea!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 4:30 PM glen wrote:
> "3D enough"? My guess is you already know all this. But just in case ... I
> would have guessed it would be easy enough in Blender (e.g.
> https://youtu.be/AlPPYkZg9D4). But I suppose it depends on how much
>
"3D enough"? My guess is you already know all this. But just in case ... I
would have guessed it would be easy enough in Blender (e.g.
https://youtu.be/AlPPYkZg9D4). But I suppose it depends on how much automation you
expect. SketchUp and AutoDesk should do something more automatic. But
Back in the day I'd sketch a character I made up: Munchy Man, super duper
hero that I'd draw on homework. And get in trouble for all kinds of made up
or borrowed sayings around Murphy's Law. Stuff like "for every question
about homework their's a equal and opposite confusing answer" I took my
I know my response doesn't approach your questions, but...
1. That's awesome. What do you sketch?
2. What got you back into it?
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p
Complexity and what's right up peoples ally:
I've gotten into sketching again. Ok that's nice you'll say. and what's
have to do with a list about math you say? the fun of x z, and wtf axis!
Is their a program where you can sketch stuff, and it' can figure out how
to make what you have drawn into
What follows are mostly speculations:
It is possible that we do not get to have closed cartesianess (with all
of its currying and the rest) and so we do not really get to have *all*
possible worlds, perhaps only those that are symmetric monoidal. Still,
what then does this mean for us, since we
It's unclear to me why friam@redfish.com was CC'ed. But I'll assume it's an
open invitation to argue ...
The Student's response seems, to me, to be clear evidence of a Bad Faith contrarian.
Anyone who has any interaction with any chemicals at all, knows the "language of a
lab tech". The
I think this comes very close to our discussion on operationism. My response
to eric’s challenge on that score was his “quantity” argument, which he himself
disavowed. The attempt to identify a concept by a single operation or even by
operations within a single paradigm is operationism, which
We haven't broached Wolpert's later questions much. But before I try to do
that, I'd like to follow up on these 2 things:
• What errors are involved with my cf to List's "indexicality"?
• My intention with the "percolation ..." was to allude to the limits of our convex hull. From
Dave's
10 matches
Mail list logo
