Loci or Loki? :P
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:21 AM Steve Smith wrote:
>
> On 9/18/22 8:00 AM, glen∉ℂ wrote:
> > Even without the math, I think the main point is that of field vs
> > particle. We talk a lot about networks. But you can imagine a smooth
> > blob of goo (maybe like Silly Putty or
On 9/18/22 8:00 AM, glen∉ℂ wrote:
Even without the math, I think the main point is that of field vs
particle. We talk a lot about networks. But you can imagine a smooth
blob of goo (maybe like Silly Putty or pizza dough) being stretched
and kneaded such that some parts are hard-ish clumps and
Gotcha!
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 8:00 AM glen∉ℂ wrote:
> Even without the math, I think the main point is that of field vs
> particle. We talk a lot about networks. But you can imagine a smooth blob
> of goo (maybe like Silly Putty or pizza dough) being stretched and kneaded
> such that some
Even without the math, I think the main point is that of field vs particle. We
talk a lot about networks. But you can imagine a smooth blob of goo (maybe like
Silly Putty or pizza dough) being stretched and kneaded such that some parts
are hard-ish clumps and other parts thin or splitting.
Thanks franks ^_^
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 2:13 PM Frank Wimberly wrote:
> 3 is {0, {0}, {0, {0}}} according to one approach to a using sets to form
> numbers that satisfy the Peano axioms. In that approach 0 and the empty
> set are identical.
>
>
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo
3 is {0, {0}, {0, {0}}} according to one approach to a using sets to form
numbers that satisfy the Peano axioms. In that approach 0 and the empty
set are identical.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022, 2:02 PM Gillian
I don't know nearly enough mind bending high levels abstract maths to have
more than tons of questions. I thought information (in the math sense)
'just' meant 3 of something and you might know of what but the
absolute value of that 3 is the piece of info your starting with, and
keep from being
Thank you for this article. Subject matter related to quantum fields,
the Schwinger effect and the Casimir effect are very much where my mind has
been lately. I continue an attempt to reconcile recent thoughts on the
different candidate GUTs, the resolution of infinite contributions of
virtual
70-year-old quantum prediction comes true, as something is created from nothing
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/something-from-nothing/
It seems like this is another example where the arrogance of the abstraction
reigns. Because the math relating holes and electrons is the same (?) as
