On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:45:06AM -0400, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Russell,
One of the first things I intend to do when I have retired in January is
read book with titles like yours, but until then, you will need to wave
excerpts at me or something.
That's why the paper might be up your
Like anything in the mainstream press, tantalisingly short on
detail. I argued back in 1996 that Economics needs to take on an
evolutionary outlook in a paper that was ultimately published in
2000. Indeed, I used the same Mashallian quote mentioned in the article:
Standish, R.K. (2000) ``The
That's strange, in my Mozilla Thunderbird (IMAP) e-Mail client
I can see the response from Russel before the original mail from
Nick about Friam Digest, Vol 37, Issue 47. Microsoft's Outlook
displays it in the correct order:
Dates in Outlook
Russel's Mail Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 9:09
Nick's Mail
Title: Message
complexity group / chaos
club
meeting time: 7 pm Thursday July
27
meeting place: Mike Oliker's (directions
below)
meeting topic: the article "Antichaos and Adaptation"
by Stuart Kauffman. The article is
available
online at www.covchap.com/articles/antichaos.htm
I think it's simply that Russel has his computer date wrong (one day early),
and while Outlook uses the local arrival time, Thunderbird uses the remote
sender's time.
Of course it's pretty absurd that in 2006 we still don't have computers on
networks naturally synchronized time-wise by default.
Yes, you are right. If I sort after the remote sender's time, Outlook
shows the wrong message order, too.
-J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Eldridge
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:01 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
I do autosyncronise my computers clock with NTP. Where it all goes
pear shaped is that I send mail from Linux running on VMWare running
on top of Windows. Everytime windows hibernates, VMWare's clock gets
screwed up.
I have a menu item that connects to NTP and syncronise's Linux's
clock, but that
I know economics uses game theory, but I'm not sure whether
evolutionary game theory has caught on. This came up in a thread on
wedtech, so I thought I'd pass it along:
I'm reading this:
Game Theory Evolving by Herbert Gintis
http://tinyurl.com/z22cj
I like it because it looks
