>
> On 30/08/16 16:43, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > Concening future developement, we need to rethink
> > some basics. First, current DeltaComplex looks
> > fine for homology (except for lack of vertices in
> > representation). But it is underspecified for
> > homotopy. As I wrote, there should
On 25/09/16 23:31, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Concerning 'randomSimplicialComplex': random testing has some
advantages and drawbacks. Main drawback is that results
change, so checking for correctness is harder. Normal
random tests have advantage that they can generate large
number of examples
On 30/08/16 16:43, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Concening future developement, we need to rethink
some basics. First, current DeltaComplex looks
fine for homology (except for lack of vertices in
representation). But it is underspecified for
homotopy. As I wrote, there should be enough
information to
> When doing "quick and dirty" fixes ...
There must be a reason why the word "dirty" is in this phrase. ;-)
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails