> I think it make more sense to have List essentially as
> now, saying that it may loop on cycles and does not
> check and another domain or package offering operations
> that correctly handle cycles. Package may be more
> appropriate because once list is verfied to be acyclic
> normal List
I find that it's possible to define "elt" for varies types
as multiplication, to achieve similar effect like MMA.
I think that's very interesting, and Spad is really flexible.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
ratDenom uses algkernels, which uses select!, modifies
its argument.
I would also suggest to rename algkernels to algkernels!.
sed -i 's/algkernels/algkernels!/' expr.spad manip.spad
--- a/src/algebra/manip.spad
+++ b/src/algebra/manip.spad
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
dummy := kernel(new()$SY)$K
In output of "multiset [1,1]", there will be a space
on both side of the colon.
And for SExpression, '1 pretend SEX' and
'"1" pretend SEX' will be distinguishable from their
output.
--- a/src/algebra/mset.spad
+++ b/src/algebra/mset.spad
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
coerce(ms : %) : OutputForm ==
> I don't know what the issues are in this particular case but,
> as a general principle, I don't like adding spaces in command
> line output if there is any danger that the extra width will trigger
> line wrapping.
I think if adding spaces pleases people's eyes, then we should do it.
There are
I would like to have a formal code style guide.
I have one style to add to it:
Function application parenthesis
-
For one argument function, "f(a)" vs. "f a", which is better?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system"
On 05/03/17 18:45, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
I worked with various code and IME it is much easier to work
with generous whitspace. When lines are getting to long just
break them up. One should try to make code simpler and
smaller, but squeezing more code in small space is counterproductive.
It
Martin Baker wrote:
>
> On 05/03/17 13:09, oldk1331 wrote:
> > The output of "[1,2]" is "[1,2]", I think adding a space
> > after a comma is better. And multiline list already does
> > this: [1,2,10^100].
>
> I don't know what the issues are in this particular case but, as a
> general
On 05/03/17 13:09, oldk1331 wrote:
The output of "[1,2]" is "[1,2]", I think adding a space
after a comma is better. And multiline list already does
this: [1,2,10^100].
I don't know what the issues are in this particular case but, as a
general principle, I don't like adding spaces in
> Also, I want to add space after a numer in product.
Also, I want to add a space after a number in product.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
Also, I want to add space after a numer in product.
So 2*sin(3*x) will be "2 sin(3 x)" instead of "2sin(3x)".
Most other CASs have this behavior (maxima, mma;
sympy uses a dot instead of a space.)
Opinions?
--- a/src/interp/i-output.boot
+++ b/src/interp/i-output.boot
@@ -501,13 +501,10 @@
The output of "[1,2]" is "[1,2]", I think adding a space
after a comma is better. And multiline list already does
this: [1,2,10^100].
--- a/src/interp/i-output.boot
+++ b/src/interp/i-output.boot
@@ -639,14 +639,14 @@
--% Aggregates
aggWidth u ==
- rest u is [a,:l] => WIDTH a + +/[1+WIDTH x
12 matches
Mail list logo
