Re: [fricas-devel] config.guess weirdness

Hi Martin, I saw the "pr.children()" problem in your ticket, a suggestion: Why not use "fricas -nosman" instead of "fricas -nox -noclef" to start FriCAS? Using "fricas -nosman", there's only 1 process, AXIOMsys. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [fricas-devel] Maybe preview

On 6 October 2017 at 11:40, Martin Baker wrote: > On 01/10/17 04:49, oldk1331 wrote: >> >> Again, I think this is a small problem, because >> 1. there's no point of using Maybe(Maybe(XXX)). > > I have not followed this thread closely so apologies if my thoughts here are > off

Re: [fricas-devel] Maybe preview

On 01/10/17 04:49, oldk1331 wrote: Again, I think this is a small problem, because 1. there's no point of using Maybe(Maybe(XXX)). I have not followed this thread closely so apologies if my thoughts here are off track. I get the impression that you now agree that monads are not currently

Re: [fricas-devel] config.guess weirdness

Hi, you can see the change here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/fricas-devel/u7HT8s_lMF8/n6UGeTvyAgAJ Quote: They are slightly hacked to produce shorter names. Yes, originals are from autotools. This version is hacked to produce slightly shorter names, instead of say

Re: [fricas-devel] Maybe preview

On 5 October 2017 at 20:34, oldk1331 wrote: > To Bill: > > 1. Benchmarking in interpreter is meaningless, I'm sure > you noticed that you can do 10^6 calls in interpreter in 4s > while do 2*10^8 calls in 0.4s in compiler. > Of course, but not completely meaningless to someone

[fricas-devel] config.guess weirdness

I am forwarding an observation by Eric Bray, concerned with making FriCAS an optional (as opposed to experimental) package for sagemath. It would be great if you could comment, ideally on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23847?replyto=35#comment, otherwise here... Weirdly, last time FriCAS