Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-19 Thread Javier Bassi
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:24 PM, ck c.kernst...@googlemail.com wrote: So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they? Just in case anyone wants to host a mirror, they are seeding a full backup of the anonleaks website (6.7GB) Here is the .torrent

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-19 Thread Chris M
Some thoughts.. Whether they did or not is probably way past irrelevant now. I'd probably wager the site owners were just pissed off with the massive bandwidth-consumption from all the scandal. Its not beyond the stretch of the imagination that private companies were hired to make these go away -

[Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread ck
So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they? ck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread Eyeballing Weev
Cryptome.org is your friend. John Young is pretty much bulletproof when it comes to file hosting and laughs at DMCA takedown requests. On 02/18/2011 11:24 AM, ck wrote: So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they? ck

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
So here's a thought. If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and hosted on one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would be eligible for take down? On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Eyeballing Weev eyeballing.w...@gmail.comwrote: Cryptome.org is your

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread Kurth Bemis
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 17:24 +0100, ck wrote: So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they? ck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:37:09 GMT, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] said: If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and hosted on one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would be eligible for take down? Questions like that are part of why FreeNet and

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:24:23 +0100, ck said: So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they? Between the Streisand Effect and things like Tor and FreeNet, the Feds will never be sure if they got all the copies or not. pgpGvtTVi9xUA.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
Oh, I didn't realise that's what FreeNet did, I thought it was a tor alternative! On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:37:09 GMT, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] said: If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:30:49 GMT, you said: Oh, I didn't realise that's what FreeNet did, I thought it was a tor alternative! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet https://freenetproject.org/ It's a semi-alternative. Both address the make it difficult to trace issue in somewhat similar ways.

Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?

2011-02-18 Thread William Warren
On 2/18/2011 11:24 AM, ck wrote: So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they? ck ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -