Am 05.09.09 04:28, schrieb Fatherlaptop:
ok. that's cool. not sure about enterprise compatibility or my English
but will check it out. my other option is front end. Lately, we have
ha lots of drive by infections. I have though trained users and
get calls on the fake alert box.
It's a
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Adrenalin adrenali...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like the plugins in Chrome are not in a sandbox
One additional, important area that is not covered by the sandbox are
plugins like Flash. Restricting what plugins can do does not fit well with
what users expect,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.sandboxie.com/
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:05:24 -0400 RandallM randa...@fidmail.com
wrote:
how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the
system.
its the users that just get gmail and click links, watch youtube
vids
and check
doesn't chrome already run any single tab in a sandbox?
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/sandbox
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
It seems like the plugins in Chrome are not in a sandbox
One additional, important area that is not covered by the sandbox are
plugins like Flash. Restricting what plugins can do does not fit well with
what users expect, which makes plugins a major vector for attack. Langley
said that the plugin
how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the system.
its the users that just get gmail and click links, watch youtube vids
and check FaceBook and Mypace that infect the network!
--
been great, thanks
a.k.a System
___
Full-Disclosure -
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, RandallMranda...@fidmail.com wrote:
how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the system.
Who or what says you can't?
Guy
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
hmmm. yes. quite.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Many people, institutions, and programs do just this. No reason why
it can't be done.
John Menerick
On Sep 4, 2009, at 11:05 AM, RandallM wrote:
how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the system.
its the users that just get gmail and click links, watch youtube vids
and
You could try VMWare to do something like this, for starters
http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/80
There are many other ways to achieve this aim. As others say, how come you
think you can't?
2009/9/4 RandallM randa...@fidmail.com
how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from
Check out:
http://www.sandboxie.com/
http://www.xenocode.com/Browsers/
~k
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 13:05 -0500, RandallM wrote:
how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the system.
its the users that just get gmail and click links, watch youtube vids
and check FaceBook and Mypace
Doesn't Vista already run Internet Explorer in a sort of sandbox?
-- Rohit Patnaik
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Kurth Bemis kurth.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out:
http://www.sandboxie.com/
http://www.xenocode.com/Browsers/
~k
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 13:05 -0500, RandallM wrote:
how
12 matches
Mail list logo
