http://upx.sourceforge.net/#download
upx is a cross platfrom executable file compreession tool
By chance, do you know of a similar tools that runs under linux?
maybe u want a debugger and not a file compreession tool ?
-aditya
ÿÿ
éb½êÞvë
Looks the june4.exe is some kind of spyware. It reference to another
site cjdra.com, possibly uploading user information there.
By chance, do you know of a similar tools that runs under linux?
gdb or under softice under wine ?
-aditya
please stop spamming the list with your advertisiement of partner programs
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Thierry Carrez' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:27 PM
Original Message
Subject: Caveat Lector: Beastie Boys Evil
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:10:23 -0700
From: Dragos Ruiu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: All Terrain Ninjas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well I truly regret actually purchasing a copy of the new Beastie Boys
album to support
Niek Baakman wrote:
Hi list,
akamai disappeared from the internet about an hour ago.
(all their dns servers are dead, hence many companies that
use akamai are unreachable: microsoft.com/liveupdate.symantec.com
apple/some search engines)
Does anyone know if it is security-related (ddos, something
They are planning to get into a market that gaurds against the failures
in their own product. I don't like this, as it seems that they are going
to be in a position to intentionally make holes that their anti-virus
software will fix. If we had a more competitive market in this type of
software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
__
SUSE Security Announcement
Package:subversion
Announcement-ID:SuSE-SA:2004:018
Date:
Todd Burroughs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are planning to get into a market that gaurds against the failures
in their own product. I don't like this, as it seems that they are going
to be in a position to intentionally make holes that their anti-virus
software will fix. If we had a more
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200406-13
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - -
I have been interested in a potential exploit that may or may not be an
issue, I read lately that a potential malicious file could enter a system
via a USB Memory stick with a structured autorun.pif , and this file would
operate even if the screen lock is activated .
M$ anti-virus free with every Outlook 2005.
On Thursday 17 June 2004 08:41 am, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
I hate to say this, but I don't think Microsoft software could be any
worse than Symantec...
Andre Ludwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think the mafia refers to this as a protection racket...
The Xbox attempts to rip your audio to the hard disk before playing it
right? This CD really sounds like crap on my Xbox... I am wondering if
the audio cuts in and out because of the copy protection they try to use.
-KF
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Caveat
Not quite, In Windows XP SP2 the system can read the autorun.inf in
removeable media (specifically USB Flash Drives) and start a program or
install etc like a CD rom does.
However I haven't seen it work.
Lan guy
- Original Message -
From: martin paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I have been interested in a potential exploit that
may or may not be an
issue, I read lately that a potential malicious file
could enter a system
via a USB Memory stick with a structured autorun.pif
, and this file would
operate even if the screen lock is activated .
This is an
My initial thought of a response to this was something along the lines of do
you wear an aluminum foil helmet as you seem to fit the profile... I decided
against that. I mean I still think it but I think this response is
better
Antivirus software will probably always be around. Why? Because
On Thu, June 17, 2004 2:45 am, Chris Cappuccio said:
The fact that Microsoft has the monopoly reflects social and economic
values, not technical ones.
I'm not sure if values is the right word. They got there by signing an
exclusive deal with IBM back when IBM made the only serious business
On 17.06.2004 10:11:06 +, joe wrote:
My initial thought of a response to this was something along the lines of do
you wear an aluminum foil helmet as you seem to fit the profile... I decided
against that. I mean I still think it but I think this response is
better
Antivirus software
I have made several attempts to validate the GPG key on this document with
GnuPG 1.2.4 and have been unsuccessful at importing the key.
Please advise.
On Wednesday 16 June 2004 08:31 am, Kurt Lieber wrote:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo
However the worms would be blocked if people had patched their machine or
otherwise properly administrated the machines they were responsible for. All
of the worms that I think you are probably referring to all had patches well
in advance of the worm that impacted it, blaster, slammer, sasser,
You make anti virus software sound like a gun lock on a 9MM.
Does it really matter who is in the anti-virus market? If Microsoft goes
that way, and they have the best knowledge of what they created, what we can
reasonably expect to see in the words of Bill Gates Innovation, with rich
user
On Thu, June 17, 2004 8:51 am, DAN MORRILL said:
Does it really matter who is in the anti-virus market? If Microsoft goes
that way, and they have the best knowledge of what they created...
(puts on tinfoil hat)
From a paranoid point of view, best knowledge of what they created is a
little
- Original Message -
From: DAN MORRILL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?
You make anti virus software sound like a gun lock on a 9MM.
Does it really matter who is in the anti-virus market? If Microsoft goes
that
On 17.06.2004 11:51:46 +, joe wrote:
However the worms would be blocked if people had patched their machine or
otherwise properly administrated the machines they were responsible for. All
of the worms that I think you are probably referring to all had patches well
in advance of the worm
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:53:45 PDT, Andre Ludwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Asked if that would hurt sales of competing products, such as Network
Associates' McAfee and Symantec's Norton family of products, Nash said
that Microsoft said that it would sell its anti-virus program as a
separate
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Eric Paynter wrote:
On Thu, June 17, 2004 8:51 am, DAN MORRILL said:
Does it really matter who is in the anti-virus market? If Microsoft goes
that way, and they have the best knowledge of what they created...
(puts on tinfoil hat)
From a
I think you will be pleasantly surprised by XP SP2 and XP Reloaded and
Windows Server R2. They are listening and they are correcting.
On the services running by default front, MS has finally come around that
corner, if you have installed 2K3 you will note a large reduction in what is
installed
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, joe wrote:
Home users never should have been impacted as they should be running
firewall software on the internet connections. The fact that they don't
isn't MS's fault, however MS is stepping up with XP SP2 to help out. On top
of that they should be patching when
Dan et al:
You are missing the point here. While it matters little *who* is in the A/V
market, it matters very much when one player is Microsoft, because the M$
business model (according to them and to the US DOJ) is to enter a market,
undercut the market, co-opt the market, drive out the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Naah.. They'd never use an undocumented API to benefit their product at the
expense of the competition, would they? ;)
In this case, no.
Given that a lot of AV technical work is reverse engineering and that
most of the best AV reversers are not among those MS
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:40:20 CDT, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have made several attempts to validate the GPG key on this document with
GnuPG 1.2.4 and have been unsuccessful at importing the key.
Please advise.
Would you go to your mechanic and say Fix my car, it's broken, or would
From my perspective, a place that MS needs to also focus on is the
patch scanning technology. SMS, WindowsUpdate, MBSA, all can give
different, confusing results even when scanning the same machine!
Please, give me a scanner that covers all of your internal products, and
gives reliable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200406-14
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Over the last two days we have received an increase in SPAM from Taiwan,
it has since moved to Latin America.
The emails contain:
MAIL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]and other names
Subject: (high bit characters)
Body of the email contains Base64 encoding.
All originating from a .tw domain.
I also agree that MS *is* turning their gigantic boat around with regards
to security. I have yet to see all the new stuff in detail, but what I've
heard, I've liked!
In my line of work (ISP) it will be greatly welcomed to have more OS' less
prone to become infected by worms, as it allows for
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Dan B. Mann wrote:
From my perspective, a place that MS needs to also focus on is the
patch scanning technology. SMS, WindowsUpdate, MBSA, all can give
different, confusing results even when scanning the same machine!
Please, give me a scanner that covers all of
They did this years back in the 90's anyone remember pctools, and their
offerings? Guess what was bundled under DOS 6.2, might have gone back to
DOS 6.0, but, pctools is no longer in the market...and was the norton
counterpart/competition at the time...so, this would be a reentry...
Thanks,
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:30:55 +1200, Nick FitzGerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Naah.. They'd never use an undocumented API to benefit their product at the
expense of the competition, would they? ;)
In this case, no.
Given that a lot of AV technical work is
hmmm... sounds like spammers rerouting in response to comcast blocking
port 25 on a large number of subscribers. that (i.e., comcast's
actions) _did_ have a significant effect on the amount of spam being
sent out.
and as expected, it's effects were short term... if only more service
providers
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 11:51:46AM -0400, joe wrote:
However the worms would be blocked if people had patched their machine or
otherwise properly administrated the machines they were responsible for. All
of the worms that I think you are probably referring to all had patches well
in advance of
Gregory:
According to Microsoft they are making their A/V a separate product. So
it'll be sold much like Microsoft Money is.
~
So if M$ enters the A/V market and bundles their solution with Windows
whatever, they likely will drive Symantec and McAfee out of the market
over time by co-opting
You really expect us to believe that the M$ AV team won't leverage off the
fact that they could know about that API, and all the others in Windows?
in addition, given that they have the sources to their own OS, i doubt
they really have to do much manual reversing... i'm sure the debugging
tools
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:37:11 EDT, Mohit Muthanna said:
You really expect us to believe that the M$ AV team won't leverage off the
fact that they could know about that API, and all the others in Windows?
in addition, given that they have the sources to their own OS, i doubt
they really have
Please correct me if I'm missing something here:
Microsoft and POBOX.com support Caller ID and SPF to help thwart phishing
and SPAM.
I can see it helping phishing (kind of) as the phishers won't be able to
forge the FROM address. But, that won't stop naive users from entering
their personal
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 03:53:25PM -0700, Alavan wrote:
Please correct me if I'm missing something here:
You are missing the fact, that it also breaks email forwarding. And if the
From header is analyzed (and that would be necessary for the fishing
prevention, because THAT is what the users get
Alavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that if we make all MTA's register somehow (both SMTP and
POST), this would eliminate the hijacked machine as spambot phenomenon. We
already have MX records for SMTP, but a lot of providers use different
machines to receive (via SMTP) and send
In some mail from Paul Schmehl, sie said:
--On Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:53:23 AM +1000 Darren Reed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a whole new play ground for organised crime, mostly thanks
to Microsoft. You've got millions of PC's around the world that
are largely, in one way or
it is an admin issue.
that is very true, like the programmers have become code monkeys, sysadmin netadmins
have become patch monkeys
The *real* IT department could then link to the
executeable and place it on an intranet server
which would be secure.
This is an interesting
The sad part about this entire topic is the futility of attempting to copy
protect in the first place. So they install some software and Mac and
Win... then some Linux kiddie rips the CD and puts it on P2P and it's out
now for the whole world. All it takes is one person to break it and it's
all
48 matches
Mail list logo
