[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:03:10 +1200, Nick FitzGerald said:
nd, your suggestion does not say what to do with bad JPEGs -- it
seems you assume the JPG to PNG convertor will necessarily and
correctly deal with such invalid input. Do we really know that is a
valid
while discussing the jpeg overflow problem and remembering the similar bmp
issue, one of my co-workers (thanks lars) brought up the idea of
sanitizing jpgs on the gateway level. google found me no hints for
existing stuff except a modified micro_proxy for converting png 2 jpg from
2001, when png
The only problem is this..there is no reason to sanitize jpeg's
as this is not a jpeg issue but a Microsoft problem when dealing
with jpeg's. Things that do not depend on the dll are not
affected(mozilla/firefox and opera if i remember correctly). If
this was a jpeg issue then everything
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:03:10 +1200, Nick FitzGerald said:
And, your suggestion does not say what to do with bad JPEGs -- it
seems you assume the JPG to PNG convertor will necessarily and
correctly deal with such invalid input. Do we really know that is a
valid assumption?
There's also
