Dear Melanie and futureworkfriends

My reply, below went off too quickly - I hope it didn't feel abrupt -
apologies.

My extended comment is this:

The whole move towards (co-operative) team working, in clusive, active
communities, local democracy, school parent govenors and etc needs to be
time-resourced.

Earlier in the year, our Campaign hosted a group of people from New Zealand
(the Human Rights 2000 Project) that seeks to bring to national governments'
attention the legal requirement (or so i understand it) to resouce their
citizens to be active human rights monitoring citizens.

Thus my call for a less-than-35 hour (paid) working week.

I envisage, for example, that paid work (bashing molecules and etc around)
take place on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, and, that, wednesday
be 'The Community Action' day - for all - when Council Meetings take place,
community focusing goes on and etc.

This, of course, has implications for the nature of 'work' during the
four-day 'working' week - a call, therefore, for William Morris'  "More
useful work, less useless toil."

And, hence my All Singing and All Dancing Co-operative Solutions Set (did I
post that to f-work ?)

Hugs 2,4,from all,

j

************
----------
From: "john courtneidge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Melanie Milanich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 35 hour week
Date: Thu, Oct 7, 1999, 8:47 pm


It's too long

j
----------
>From: Melanie Milanich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: 35 hour week
>Date: Wed, Oct 6, 1999, 5:31 pm
>

>With all the protests by businesses (and the threats to lay off staff)
>against the 35 hour work week, its implementation next year seems
>shaky.  Analysts say that France is going against the trend in the rest
>of Europe to part-time and temporary employment and will not be able to
>compete.  What do you people think about the potential of the 35 hour
>week for paid permanent employment?  Who is still advocating it and
>where?
>Melanie
>
>

Reply via email to