Didn't they try a lot of this in 1930's and 1940's Germany? It caused a
lot of trouble.
do you mean democratic planning? I don't remember
any of that happening anywhere. An elite/one person
decided for everybody else what to do, people were not convinced by
the rationality of the plans
From: Jay Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If engineers can do it, then no one can. But I don't think we will even
get
I had a typo, it should say: "If engineers can't do it, then no one can."
There is at least one other excellent reason this should be turned over to
"engineers": engineers hate
"Jay Hanson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michael Gurstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our Economic System: Badly Designed?
by Roberto Verzola*
Follow the design rules, and you get a system that is robust and
reliable. Violate the design rules, and you get
pete wrote:
[snip]
I've suggested here before, that if the world economy was given as a
problem for systems engineers to design, they 'd be able to put together
something which would work so much better than what we've got, it would
be unbelievable. However, there are obviously problems,
In a message dated 98-10-02 17:04:10 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Our Economic System: Badly Designed?
by Roberto Verzola*
Sorry folks, but i refer back to the original post containing the paper
authored by Mr. Verzola - no i didn't save it
In a message dated 98-10-02 17:04:10 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is an accurate representation of at least part of what Verzola is
saying then it is incorrect. Even in such a system there is no reason at
all
to believe that the modules interacting with each other via the data cannot
