Re: Fw: NYT on the Future (and the liberal professoriat)

1999-12-04 Thread Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
Brian McAndrews wrote: [snip] Progress Without People By: Russell Mokhiber January 4, 1999 MIT Professor Noam Chomsky makes the point that if you serve power, power rewards

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-12-04 Thread Tom Karnofsky
Ray, I've been lurking on future-work for years, and love and often agree with your thought provoking and passionate posts. In regards to this one, though, I would like to point our that there is no such thing as a "typical 16 year old adolescent", any more than there is such thing as a

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-12-04 Thread Ray E. Harrell
Tom, Thanks for your compliments. I would like to point out a couple of things from my own discipline. There is such a thing as stylistic convention. French Style is a coherency that is different from German or Italian. Before the abuse of "convention" and its subversion into a primitive

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-12-02 Thread Brian McAndrews
The following book review presents another view (and saves me a helluva lot of typing!). Brian McAndrews Computer Power and Human Reason by Joseph Weizenbaum San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman 1976 REVIEWED BY:

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-12-02 Thread Brian McAndrews
A few veterans of this list will remember me trying to get a book club started. I suggested reading David Noble's Progress Without People: In Defense of Luddism. Noble argues that luddites smashed machines because their children were starving. Would you do likewise? I heard a women on T.V. last

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-12-02 Thread Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
Brian McAndrews wrote: The following book review presents another view (and saves me a helluva lot of typing!). Brian McAndrews Computer Power and Human Reason by Joseph Weizenbaum San Francisco, CA:

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-12-01 Thread Steve Kurtz
Hi Brad, As usual I find your analysis mostly cogent and challenging. Perhaps you can help me here: When the word "transcendental" is as trendy as "algorithmic" there will be some hope for a future. I'm familiar with the "Transcendentalist" writers including Emerson and Thoreau. What

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-12-01 Thread Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
Steve Kurtz wrote: Hi Brad, As usual I find your analysis mostly cogent and challenging. Perhaps you can help me here: When the word "transcendental" is as trendy as "algorithmic" there will be some hope for a future. I'm familiar with the "Transcendentalist" writers including

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-11-30 Thread Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
Michael Gurstein wrote: - Original Message - From: Bruce Podobnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WORLD SYSTEMS NETWORK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 1999 12:17 PM Subject: NYT on the Future You may find this editorial from the New York Times interesting. It addresses

Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-11-28 Thread Michael Gurstein
- Original Message - From: Bruce Podobnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WORLD SYSTEMS NETWORK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 1999 12:17 PM Subject: NYT on the Future You may find this editorial from the New York Times interesting. It addresses Marxism, Gandhi, and forecasts of

Re: Fw: NYT on the Future

1999-11-28 Thread Christoph Reuss
The NYT wrote: In other words, the 21st century will have its Marx. This next great challenger of the governing ideological paradigm, this hypothetical cyber-Marx, is one of our children or grandchildren or great-grandchildren, and he or she could appear in Shandong Province or Cairo or