Michael Gurstein wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 15:52:41 -0700
From: Michael Givel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: High Tech Temps Aren't Mourning, They are Organizing
Labor Group Wants to Organize Tech Temp Workers
It seeks
Dear Peter:
You have made many points, I hesitate to say good points because I disagree
with some of them. Without going through all your comments, I would like to
keep this at a general brainstorming rather than a nitpicking exercise.
War exists. For many reasons - all of them justifiable
to the list for double posting my last message.
My server did not show it as having gone through when it apparently
had.
Ed
Brad McCormick, Ed.D. wrote:
Ray E. Harrell wrote:
Brad McCormick, Ed.D. wrote:
Ray E. Harrell wrote:
[snip]
I'm reminded of a friend doing research on fish behaviorat the New York
Museum of Natural History. He is a
psychologist and quit the team because he said that he
Ed Weick wrote:
Arthur Cordell:
Does this mean that we have to accept the unravelling of the success of
economic development as though it is entirely outside our control? Are
there no policy options or actions that we can develop?
Much of my thinking and angst is to develop ways in
Title: Re: Charles Leadbetter
PS: I assumed on first reading that Ian had written this lengthy post, it
was only after I had read it again and written my comments that I realized
it was written by Charles Leadbetter, so rather than spend the time
re-writng, please accept my apoligies Ian and to
LEADERSHIP AND COMPETENCY
I have typed in portions of an article by the complexity scholar
John Warfield with his permission to share. I think it bears
on the pedagogy of the first part of leadership, the ability to
see the levels of complication connected to the team's
incompetencies
Title: Gwynne Dyer Article
This was in Saturday's Globe and Mail. I found it scary and enlightening and well worth a good slow read. If there is truth here, we all better be worrying more than we are - not that it will do a damn bit of good.
Respectfully,
Thomas Lunde
The panic has passed.
Steve Kurtz wrote:
Thomas once again has given us his insightful, sobering commentary on a
unidimensional, rather ephemeral perception of the human predicament. It
is not realistic to continue discussing the future of work without
including the future of the caloric input required for brain
Tom Walker wrote:
we have moved in the past 25 years since the "energy crisis" of the 1970s
into a system of perverse
incentives that primarily REWARDS ENERGY WASTE and implicitly penalizes
resource conservation.
This claim could be countered by Buckminster Fuller's notion of
Steve Kurtz wrote:
Are there no reactions to my post about the Workfare for Capital piece?
Perhaps all listmembers grasped its ideological hyperbole immediately!
Context, Steve, context. Your response to Jim Stanford's piece seemed to
miss the point that poor-bashing and welfare-bashing have
11 matches
Mail list logo
