Title: FW: The profit motif knows no conscience
Thomas:
This posting is from Graffis and re-posted from EnviroScan:
-- RISING COAL USE INCREASES AIR POLLUTION
Coal consumption in the U.S. has risen almost 16 percent since 1992,
says a report by the Environmental Working Group and the U.S.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:42:38 +0200
From: Niki Best [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Online Conference on Organized Labour in the 21st Century
(Apologies for cross-posting)
JOHN A. TAUBE WRITES
Im writing the following because I feel that I have an important
message to protesters in general and KPFA protesters in particular.
Let me be up front: I think KPFA protesters are extremely dedicated to
their cause, not one of them is so engaged for selfish reasons. After
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 10:26:01 -0400
From: Henry Milner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I received this on another listserve.What can one say?
Los Angeles Times, June 1, 1998
In California, more than 600 lawyer hopefuls were
Ray,
I'm not really sure of where this is taking us. Much as we would like to,
we can't resuscitate history. The bacilli and viruses moved overwhelmingly
in one direction and not the other. What was destroyed can never be
recovered. While those viruses were doing their thing over here, my
Permit me to insert, in medias res, a concern I have:
Ed Weick wrote:
Too bad they can't assess liability for lost families,
intellectual capital, land use ideas etc. It seems to
me that you are using the rules of a divorce without
separating.
Better you start with the ideas of justice
If there is no such thing as obligations to past generations, then the
idea of History is nullified. If an action such as a genocide has no
force after a given number of years, then as long as one can get away
with it for the requisite period, the action has no value except to let
others know
Brad McCormick, Ed.D. wrote:
Permit me to insert, in medias res, a concern I have:
Ed Weick wrote:
REH not Ed wrote this
Too bad they can't assess liability for lost families,
intellectual capital, land use ideas etc. It seems to
me that you are using the rules of a divorce
