Thomas:
Thanks for your detailed comments. On one point we have agreement Douglas,
we have both got our dates set wrong on our computer. I was puzzeled that
your message was at the bottom of my date ordered inbox - really, Friday,
Feb 27, 1920 is further than I ever dared to err.
You wrote:
Testing
Thomas Lunde wrote in response to Douglas P. Wilson:
Thanks for your detailed comments. On one point we have agreement Douglas,
we have both got our dates set wrong on our computer. I was puzzeled that
your message was at the bottom of my date ordered inbox - really, Friday,
Feb 27, 1920
About the date:
we have both got our dates set wrong on our computer. I was puzzeled that
your message was at the bottom of my date ordered inbox - really, Friday,
Feb 27, 1920 is further than I ever dared to err.
Oddly enough my sent-messages box clearly shows the date as Aug. 2, 2099,
I'm not sure I understand what you've been saying, Thomas, but one
sentence stands out --
I'm sorry that you seem to have given up on the best idea I've seen.
That's not the kind of thing I do. I collect good ideas and also what
other people think are good ideas, and I try to find the kernel
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:26:55 +
From: Kerry Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CPI-UA] The Internet Solution for Workers' Rights
Occasionally Tom Friedman gets the picture:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/opinion/friedman/073099frie.html
July 30, 1999
