--
--
From: "Thomas Lunde" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Douglas P. Wilson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Co-stupidity (and the flaws that cause it, or context that
nourishes it)
Date: Thu, Aug 5, 1999, 8:56 PM
I would like to mention WesBurt at the start of this post. I have just read
Dear Future Work
My earlier postings got several private responses. I assume they don't want
to be quoted so I include only the questions sent by one provcative person
and my answers. Consider...
1; You do not define the nature of the durable goods that will enable
unearned income for all,
This is a partial reply to Wes Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED] whose material
a still have a lot of trouble with. Perhaps it's a case of the pot
calling the kettle black, Mr. Burt, but I still find most of what you
write incomprehensible. However there is at least a part of one
sentence that I think I
I just now attempted to send a message to my own mailing list,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and got a very nasty bounce
message because the Esosoft mailing-list host software (their
enhanced version of majordomo) will not accept messages from
the 21st century. That seems terribly unfair to us time
REH wrote:
We all notice the immense contradiction between
people greedily taking everything they can, declaring
that everyone is only responsible to themselves while
building an internet of sites where the "butterfly effect"
is more the rule than their hyper individuality.
For the record:
Christoph Reuss wrote:
REH wrote:
We all notice the immense contradiction between
people greedily taking everything they can, declaring
that everyone is only responsible to themselves while
building an internet of sites where the "butterfly effect"
is more the rule than their hyper
--
Hi Ray, Chris, et al,
I am a twenty seven year resident of Sillycon Valley and one of those
technologists responsible for the Y2K problems.
Please don't suggest that all SV residents are followers of those vocal
Libertarians that seem to have become the spokespersons of many of
