Re: 2. Re: FW: The structure of future work and its consequences -- techies

2000-01-19 Thread Christoph Reuss
Brad McCormick wrote: I find it rather remarkable that techies still have any [human] interest in having mates, and that they make any effort to find mates. Well, what about all those DINKs (double income no kids) who don't want to have their "standard of living" lowered by kids ? (costs,

Your note of 01/16/2000, Re: Subsidiarity and the Basic Income

2000-01-19 Thread WesBurt
To: John Vandenberg and friends on several mail lists. Many thanks, John, for sending me the executive summary of the article by Lucy Sullivan entitled, "Tax Injustice: Keeping the family cap-in-hand," which can be found at www.cis.org.au in the Issues Analysis section. I found Ms.

Re: 2. Re: FW: The structure of future work and its consequences -- techies

2000-01-19 Thread Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
Christoph Reuss wrote: Brad McCormick wrote: I find it rather remarkable that techies still have any [human] interest in having mates, and that they make any effort to find mates. Well, what about all those DINKs (double income no kids) who don't want to have their "standard of