Arthur wrote#58; They are#58;
"";
"".
No exceptions allowed!
The first, of course, means that that their can be no such thing as
unemployment - which might lead to some rewarding questions.
The second accounts for some behavior that we are sometimes affronted by.
It seems to me
I have to admit that there is a certain kind of "economy" (in the sense of
parsimony) in the fact that you have managed to amuse yourself for half a
century with a single solipsistic word game. A contemporary of Henry George,
Lewis Carroll, described this word game in "Through the Looking
At 09:11 PM 10/22/97 -0700, Harry Pollard wrote:
"Man's desires are unlimited";
I don't mind the dictionary description of the term 'desire' - 'conscious
impulse toward an object or experience that promises enjoyment or
satisfaction in its attainment'.
OK, your claim is falsified. My desires
Tom wrote:
I have to admit that there is a certain kind of "economy" (in the sense of
parsimony) in the fact that you have managed to amuse yourself for half a
century with a single solipsistic word game. A contemporary of Henry George,
Lewis Carroll, described this word game in "Through the
Allan Scharf writes:
The only problem with crime is that it is not in your self-interest. Not
many criminals are rich until they die of old age, enjoy respect and
self-esteem, get elected as president of the local service club, and can
stay in bed all night. When crime is in one's self
Arthur Cordell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Harry Pollard wrote:
whole science rests on these two assumptions. In half century of teaching
adults, no-one has successfully responded to "Come up with two examples of
people not described by both Assumptions".
They are:
"Man's
Well, let's assume you are right. That your half century of teaching has
produced a profound truth and that this is the way it really is. Man's
desires are unlimited. Certainly the evidence in the daily paper seems to
substantiate this idea. Self interest reigns supreme. We, collectively,
- About human desires being limitless - I can't see anything
wrong with that. It is a rational assumption - through science
we are getting better and better approximations to the
physical/chemical/cosmic etc laws of the universe, and we
are producing the technology that makes life
Walter Derzko wrote (see below):
It's best for a basic assumption to be a self-evident truth. It's good not
to have too many, as errors are bound to creep in. (Bertrand Russell said
better to have 2 than 16.)
The Classical Political Economy I teach has two Basic Assumptions. The
whole
At 12:18 PM 10/20/97 -0700, Harry Pollard wrote:
The Classical Political Economy I teach has two Basic Assumptions. The
whole science rests on these two assumptions. In half century of teaching
adults, no-one has successfully responded to "Come up with two examples of
people not described by
On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Harry Pollard wrote:
whole science rests on these two assumptions. In half century of teaching
adults, no-one has successfully responded to "Come up with two examples of
people not described by both Assumptions".
They are:
"Man's desires are unlimited";
"Man
What do you take for granted in your discipline ? Is it carved in stone?
What basic assumptions have been challenged in your field over the past
year ? What is it that you always took for granted but don't any more?
Here's my candidate for physics/chemistry.
Grade 10 physics and chemistry
12 matches
Mail list logo
