Ray,
A year or two ago I pointed out in an article that the first concern of
corporation management is corporation management. Not the shareholders,
not the customers, but themselves. I didn't foresee how this would
escalate.
On the other hand, politicians have self interest at the heart of all
Hi Keith,
You wrote (to Ed and Arthur): But, thankfully, you are both
outnumbered now by
enough economists (and the chattering classes) who know
that full-blown
Keynesianism will only lead to a repeat of the inflation
that we suffered
in the 70s and which deprived millions of their savings in
Keith,
You still haven't answered my question
And who or what group would ensure that transparency? Seems that oversight
and regulation ensures transparency and playing by the rules.
Your answer that the present oversight group missed 4 large scandals doesn't
speak to the scandals that have
Arthur and Ed,
Albrecht makes little sense. Neither does much of modern economics.
Imagine physicists discussing the pendulum swinging back to phlogiston.
Incidentally, in his later years Hayek at times appeared closer to Keynes
than Friedman.
The problem with the economic pendulum is that at
- Forwarded by Louise Trottier/NMSTC on 05/04/02 10:36 AM -
From: Jonathan Coopersmith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: CFP: The Labour History of the Information
Sent by: History of Technology Revolution
Discussion: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/04/02 06:28 PM
On Sat, 06 Apr 2002, Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are so many PhD credentialled persons still believing
in and many of them practicing the particular metaphysical
doctrine of computer-scientism (everything that
comes from the idea that human existence in the Lifeworld
is
