At 19:42 27/08/02 -0400, Brad McCormick wrote:
I think [the KH hypothesis] makes a lot of sense. I can't be sure it's
true, but it seems to connect the dots a lot better than the other
alternatives we've heard.
So, Keith, let me ask you to shed light on one more question,
which looks to me
It is interesting that there were two important meetings concerning the
Middle East this week.
1. On Monday, the Foreign Minister of Qatar (wher the Americans are
building a massive air base) met with Saddam Hussein's Foreign Minister,
Naji Sabri. Before going into the meeting, Hamad Al Thani
Further to my reply to Brad ( KISS) earlier this morning, it's always
possible that the underdog will win. In the (most unlikely) event of a
full-bloodied American invasion of Iraq, then, as Nicholas D. Kristof
pointed out in the NYT yesterday (Wimps on Iraq), Saddam Hussein wouldn't
dream of
From an otherwise excellent examination of the issues you wrote:
You wrote I can't be sure it's true. I can't be sure either either but,
dangerous though Bush's present policy is, it seems to me that inaction by
Bush is even more dangerous (that is, from Bush's point of view concerning
the
Hi Ray,
This brief bit of what you wrote reminded me of a great line from
the movie Little Big Man.
At 1:18 PM -0400 8/28/02, Ray Evans Harrell wrote:
I have no problems with admitting the predator, I just don't
believe that anyone who is given power deserves being called a human being
Well . . . it seems as though I was wrong about China being in the know
about Bush's (real) plans for the Middle East. According to CNN (see below)
there was yet another important meeting this week when Chinese Foreign
Minister Tang visited Baghdad yesterday and told Iraqi's Foreign Minister
that
Ray Evans Harrell wrote:
So I think you are not correct in your judgment about the soldiers in
modern warfare. We are so much more complicated than the Geneva
Convention in its naive simplicity that we can't even deal with the
definition of Genocide.
War criminals and their parrots may
Keith Hudson wrote:
At 19:42 27/08/02 -0400, Brad McCormick wrote:
[snip]
Why doesn't Dubya implement measures to dramatically
raise the MPG of America's motor vehicle fleet and also
to drastically cut the number of miles driven, thus resulting
in multiplicative improvements? Why? Why
Following a link on a previous posting, I ran into this editorial.
Note the comments about IMF and advantage to the US at the end of the article.
- Karen
Chilling
message
Arab News Editorial 29
August 2002
Nigerias decision to suspend repayments on its
$33 billion foreign debt because
Chris,
Sorry but I really do have a lot of work that I must do and must limit this.
I read your material and basically stand by everything that I have said.
Needless to say I don't agree in any with with your War Criminal accusation.
There is a big problem between the language of the Genocide
10 matches
Mail list logo
