They also shared a certain superficiality. A concern with the self.
-Original Message-
From: Harry Pollard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Keith Hudson; Karen Watters Cole
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: An Uncertain Britain
Keith,
I
own narcissism, legacy, petulence or other foolishness.Otherwise
he/she should resign.
-Original Message-
From: Karen Watters Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FW: An Uncertain Britain
Yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KW
I hesitate to mention it lest there is an onslaught of rehashed Clinton
analysis, but with Clinton it was significant that he had an alcoholic and
possibly abusive stepfather and was raised by a flamboyant mother.
Protecting dark family secrets and promoting a
Karen,
I doubt that Dubya has a need for popular election. He was elected
according to the rules of the country. That's enough. He does have a need
to be re-elected as do all politicians. As soon as they are elected, they
think about re-election.
Also, he wasn't elected by the US Supreme
AHA! Another contrarian opinion about the Iraq war and Tony Blair
originating from Bath, England!!! And
there is a quote in Latin! Cheers! Karen
An Uncertain Ally on
Iraq @ http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/29/opinion/29WHEA.html
By
GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT August 29, 2002
BATH, England
Karen,
At 06:51 29/08/02 -0700, you wrote:
AHA! Another contrarian opinion about the Iraq war and Tony Blair,
originating from Bath, England!!! And there is a quote in Latin! Cheers!
Karen
What a wonderful lot we are in Bath! I've heard of Geoffrey Wheatcroft,
though I haven't met him.
Keith,
I suspect the reason why Blair and Clinton got on so well is because they
each had policies keyed to the latest opinion poll.
Harry
___
Keith wrote:
Karen,
At 06:51 29/08/02 -0700, you wrote:
AHA! Another contrarian opinion about the Iraq war and Tony Blair,
Harry, to that also add that both men wanted to change their party and
modernize it, and, historically, they did, at least wrestling the office
away from entrenched leadership. Some say the pendulum swings anyway, and
some say it is helped a bit.
Karen
Harry wrote: Keith,
I suspect the reason
