At 15:45 17/08/02 -0400, you wrote:
(REH)
Wow Keith,
That is some gift you gave me this morning.I'm having to work more on
other projects due to the financial issues that we all are talking about on
the list.e.g. I lost an account yesterday which amounted to 20% of my
income when that
Keith,
You are right on! There are a couple of supporting bits of evidence.
1) We are willing to put security over freedom [John Ashcroft is the
first step in a fulfilling of the novel '1984' although the author blew
it by 24 years].
2) Willingness of the Bush/Cheney combo to delay action on
Greetings, Keith,
I agree with Ray's Wow!
I must have missed the fling smile -- could you take a couple of minutes
to summarize what Probram's 'holographic' model suggested? Apologies for
not already having some acquaintance with it -- my library is a couple of
thousand miles from here.
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: America in decline? (was Re: What is Economics, Hudson?
Greetings, Keith,
I agree with Ray's Wow!
I must have missed the fling smile -- could you take a couple of minutes
to summarize what Probram's 'holographic' model suggested
At 12:23 18/08/02 -0700, you wrote:
Greetings, Keith,
I agree with Ray's Wow!
I must have missed the fling smile -- could you take a couple of minutes
to summarize what Probram's 'holographic' model suggested? Apologies for
not already having some acquaintance with it -- my library is a couple
Greetings, Ray and Keith,
Many thanks for your thoughtful and helpful postings on the idea of the
holographic brain. I am taking the liberty of replying in this email to
both of you, and of troubling you with some additional questions based on
what you describe.
1) I do understand, Ray, the
-
From: Ray Evans Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Keith Hudson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Brain is not a holograph (RE: America in decline? (was Re:
What is Economics, Hudson?
The
holographic idea only had flimsy
Ray,
I'm mainly replying to your posting, but also copying to Karen and Ed.
You found my final description (of the frontal lobes of the cortex) just a
little too cute. Well, yes, I brought it in almost as an adjunct to the
economistic-type argument previously -- but mainly because I wasn't able
Very interesting posting, Keith. I'll think about it, and may or may not
reply off-list. But let me briefly introduce another thought that comes
from a limited amount of reading I've done in things like chaos theory and
cosmology. I tried to introduce the thought in my response to Robert a
(snip) Not because I didn't like it, in fact I loved it. I would say that
this is my favorite post of Keith's of all time. I would give you a Nobel
for it but it would have to be shared with the James Burke and his wonderful
Connections television program.Here in the US we are really
that link too.
Karen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ray Evans Harrell
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Keith Hudson
Cc: Ed Weick; Harry Pollard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is Economics, Hudson?
(snip
: Re: What is Economics, Hudson?
(snip) Not because I didn't like it, in fact I loved it. I
would say that
this is my favorite post of Keith's of all time. I would give
you a Nobel
for it but it would have to be shared with the James Burke and
his wonderful
Connections television program
12 matches
Mail list logo
